07.12.2012 Views

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUANTITY 275<br />

is another example frequently used by him to illustrate the production of<br />

such knowledge. As I argued in chapter 6, he also saw geometry as an<br />

embodied practice (cf. e.g. A 239ff./B299ff.). Thus, I conclude that it is<br />

possible to interpret Kant’s theory of quantity as referring to an<br />

embodied practice (the practice of counting) and that there is textual<br />

evidence in the Critique supporting the view that this was how Kant<br />

conceived of the matter.<br />

One last question that may need to be discussed is whether we are<br />

entitled to interpret the category of quantity as such as an embodied<br />

practice, or whether we should adopt the more modest claim, that it is<br />

only when we apply this category that we are involved in the practice<br />

defined above. Expressed in Kantian terminology, is the category an<br />

embodied practice, or is it only the schematized category which is such a<br />

practice?<br />

As long as we distinguish between a category and its schema, the<br />

latter option must be preferred, I think. However, it is not obvious that<br />

we are justified in upholding such a distinction. Even if Kant is not<br />

unambiguous on this point, a number of interpreters have argued that<br />

there is no room in his theory for the notion of an unschematized<br />

category. By defining a category as an act [Handlung] or a function<br />

performed with regard to the empirical manifold of our intuitions, Kant<br />

by definition seems to say that the category has no existence in<br />

abstraction from its employment. Gardner comments:<br />

... the notion of an unschematized category disappears, or becomes a<br />

dubious abstraction from the conditions of empirical knowledge... 6<br />

If so, then we are entitled to adopt the stronger of the two options<br />

suggested above, that the category of quantity as such may be interpreted<br />

as an embodied practice. This will also be my position. This means,<br />

however, that whenever the claim is made that a category is an embodied<br />

practice, the term ‘category’ is used in the sense of a schematized<br />

category.<br />

6<br />

Gardner (1999), 169f. Cf. also Kambartel (1976), 127.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!