07.12.2012 Views

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34<br />

of mental illness results. 59 In his description of the functioning of the<br />

mind, Kant also includes what in other contexts is called imagination<br />

[Einbildungskraft]. He describes the capacity of the mind to ‘paint<br />

pictures of things that are not immediately present’. 60 When this capacity<br />

is disturbed there occurs the mental illness called Verrückung.<br />

What is interesting in all this is not only that we recognize the<br />

perspective from Universal natural history but it is also worth noting how<br />

the cognitive powers of the mind, later to appear in the elevated spheres<br />

of transcendental philosophy, are here discussed within the down-toearth<br />

field of mental diseases. Kant more than suggests that these diseases<br />

are caused by bodily disturbances. 61 He warns against what he takes to be<br />

a common prejudice of his time, namely the assumption that mental<br />

illnesses have only mental causes. Contrary to this common belief, the<br />

causes of mental illnesses are primarily to be sought in bodily<br />

disturbances, he claims. 62<br />

The idea that mental diseases are caused by<br />

bodily disturbances is also implied by his constant shifting between the<br />

notion of a disturbed head [Kopf] or brain [Gehirn] on the one hand<br />

and a disturbed mind [Gemüt] or soul [Seele] on the other, as if it were<br />

obvious and beyond dispute that these corresponded to each other.<br />

Maladies of the mind is a text devoid of any ontological hypotheses.<br />

This does not mean, however, that Kant has now put all interest in<br />

ontology behind him. On the contrary, two years later, in 1766, ontology<br />

again becomes a major topic of discussion. However, the approach is<br />

now more critical and agnostic than ever.<br />

1.8 Dreams of a spirit-seer<br />

Dreams of a spirit-seer from 1766 is one of the most commented on of all<br />

Kant’s works apart from the three Critiques. Its association with the<br />

Swedish mystic Emmanuel Swedenborg, its dialectical and ironic style,<br />

and its critical examination of central aspects of traditional ontology have<br />

continued to intrigue readers up until our own time, resulting in a<br />

number of commentaries. 63 It is often seen as heralding a new critical<br />

59<br />

THE EMBODIED M<strong>IN</strong>D<br />

Ak II: 264.<br />

60<br />

Ak II: 265.<br />

61<br />

That physical decay may negatively influence our cognitive functioning, was<br />

maintained also in Universal natural history, cf. Ak I: 357.<br />

62<br />

Ak II: 270.<br />

63<br />

For a discussion of Dreams of a spirit-seer and its significance within in Kant's<br />

development, as well as a survey of various interpretations of this text, see for<br />

instance Laywine (1993), 15ff. or Shell (1996), 106ff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!