07.12.2012 Views

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e based on this idea, i.e. it requires that we direct our attention to the<br />

embodied aspects of man and to his embodied acts and practices. 38<br />

3.5 Basedow and Crusius<br />

Similar influences to those just mentioned may also have come through<br />

the writings of Johann Bernhard Basedow, whose pedagogical ideas Kant<br />

eagerly supported. In 1774 Basedow opened a radical educational<br />

institution in Germany, an initiative backed by Kant. In the same year,<br />

pedagogy was introduced as a subject at the University at Königsberg,<br />

and in the following year pedagogy was added to the topics on which<br />

Kant lectured. 39<br />

Less radical, and theoretically not as interesting as Rousseau's Émile,<br />

Basedow nevertheless ascribes a basic significance to practice.<br />

Concerning the education of the young gentleman, he suggests in his<br />

Elementarwerk that he should spend time with experienced artisans and<br />

craftsmen in order to learn to use their tools to perform simple<br />

operations. 40 He also recommends regular studies in practice on a wellrun<br />

farm. 41 By being part of such practical contexts, the student acquires<br />

his first concepts of the relevant arts and of agriculture. Basedow, like<br />

Rousseau, ascribes to embodied participation a highly significant role in<br />

the education of practical skills, skills, moreover, valued more highly than<br />

mere theoretical reflections.<br />

A third source of influence may have been Christian August Crusius<br />

who in his Anweisung vernünftig zu leben promoted a cognitive theory<br />

with pragmatic strains, based on an anthropology in which the human<br />

mind was seen as radically embodied. 42 As Tonelli points out, Crusius<br />

was an eclectic whose position was not always consistent. 43<br />

95<br />

Thus, his<br />

pragmatism is perhaps not as clear cut as the pragmatism of e.g.<br />

Rousseau. I still, however, see him as a possible influence on Kant. He<br />

introduces his Anweisung vernunftig zu leben with a chapter on<br />

Thelematologie, or a theory of the will. ‘Will’ is here defined as the<br />

38<br />

That Kant saw Rousseau as an inspiration within the field of rational theory is<br />

suggested also by a remark found in the Blomberg Logic of 1771. Here Rousseau<br />

is heralded as supplying a ‘grammar of the understanding’. Cf. Ak XXIV: 300.<br />

Cf. also Ak XXIV: 495 and Zammito (2002), 260-261.<br />

39<br />

Cf. Munzel (1999), 266ff.<br />

40<br />

Basedow (1965), 192.<br />

41<br />

Ibid., 192.<br />

42<br />

For Crusius’ influence on Kant, cf. also Heimsoeth (1971), 127ff.<br />

43<br />

Tonelli (1969).<br />

RATIONALITY <strong>AND</strong> EMBODIED <strong>PRACTICE</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!