07.12.2012 Views

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120<br />

RATIONALITY <strong>AND</strong> EMBODIED <strong>PRACTICE</strong><br />

Something must make this difference, and so we postulate an<br />

intermediate explanatory link. 95<br />

Against this Wittgenstein reminds us that the criteria we actually use<br />

in order to decide whether a person follows a rule or not are not found<br />

by looking into the inner, mental world of this person, which is of course<br />

impossible, but at her overt acts, including her citing of rules as a<br />

justification for what she has done. Also, rather than ascribe to our inner,<br />

mental powers the capacity to direct our calculations, Wittgenstein asks<br />

us to view them as inner experiences accompanying these overt acts. 96<br />

What is it then that guides us in the calculation? Rather than pointing at<br />

inner, mental mechanisms, Wittgenstein refers to socialization and<br />

practice.<br />

Wittgenstein, according to Baker, also critically examines another<br />

myth of rationality, a myth based on the metaphorical distinction<br />

between the ‘rule of law’ and the ‘rule of man’, where the first is held up<br />

as an ideal of impartiality. Wittgenstein’s point is that we are easily<br />

seduced by this metaphor into canceling out mankind altogether. The<br />

idea of the ‘rule of law’ seems to be grounded in the belief that rules, if<br />

properly drafted, determine their own applications quite independently<br />

of how we apply them, as if verdicts in particular cases were already<br />

foreshadowed in the rules. In the resulting mythology, rules are viewed as<br />

absolutely rigid bodies, and systems of rules as peculiarly adamantine<br />

machines. In the context of this mythology, performing a calculation is<br />

like constructing and activating a machine which inexorably grinds out<br />

the correct answers without any further intervention from us. 97<br />

As an alternative to this metaphor, Wittgenstein suggests the<br />

metaphor of the signpost. 98<br />

A signpost may serve to guide a walker along<br />

a footpath, but not by dragging him along an invisible set of tracks. Its<br />

power to guide is parasitic on the existence of a practice, he argues.<br />

Erecting a signpost would be pointless unless there were in the<br />

community at large a general disposition to respond to its presence in a<br />

particular way. 99 By this metaphor he suggests that the application of<br />

rules presupposes a practice. For a person to be able to correctly follow a<br />

95<br />

Ibid., 51.<br />

96<br />

Philosophical investigations, § 152, cf. Baker (1981), 51-52.<br />

97<br />

Philosophical investigations, §§ 189-194, cf. Baker (1981), 52.<br />

98<br />

Philosophical investigations, § 85.<br />

99<br />

Ibid., § 87.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!