07.12.2012 Views

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

SPATIAL EXPERIENCE <strong>AND</strong> THE <strong>BODY</strong> <strong>IN</strong> THE CRITIQUE<br />

extended world with objects likewise extended, i.e. with shape and size,<br />

and standing in spatial relations to each other.<br />

A further comparison lies in the fact that in the exercise of these skills,<br />

the subject is typically 18 both active and passive. That this idea is part of<br />

Kant’s critical theory of space was established above. Expressed in the<br />

critical terminology, his point is that while the content or matter [Stoff]<br />

of an empirical intuition, what he also refers to as ‘sensation’<br />

[Empfindung], originates in the passive affection of the subject, i.e. its<br />

outer sense, its form emerges through certain acts performed by this<br />

subject.<br />

Now, how does Kant describe the active-passive character of spatial<br />

experience within his embodied theory of space? If we look at the<br />

Anthropology, we see how Kant explicitly describes the outer senses as<br />

part of the body, and, moreover, that our sensations originate in the<br />

physical affection of these senses. However, in order to experience a<br />

spatially extended object, being passively affected is not enough. The<br />

subject also has to act, for instance by reaching out for the object and<br />

grasping it. This act gives us a concept of its shape. In order to get a<br />

more comprehensive grasp of the spatially extended world around us,<br />

other activities are also required: we have to walk or run or move around<br />

in other ways.<br />

Within the perspective of Kant’s embodied theory of space, the<br />

active-passive character of spatial experience is best seen, I think, if we<br />

focus on the act of grasping an object. Such an example also makes<br />

explicit the characteristic reciprocity between the active and passive<br />

aspects of the act. Imagine a person exploring an object with her hands.<br />

In moving her hands along the surface of the object, she is active. At the<br />

same time, in the very same act, however, her hands are also passively<br />

affected by the object, by its texture, its weight, its shape etc. Thus, at one<br />

and the same time, she is both active and passive. This activity and<br />

passivity, moreover, are different aspects of the same event. They may be<br />

distinguished conceptually, but they cannot be separated in the real<br />

world.<br />

5.12 Two versions of the same theory?<br />

We have seen that both in his critical and embodied theory of space<br />

Kant puts forward the idea that in spatial experience, the subject is<br />

18<br />

I will later discuss whether within Kant’s theory of space there are any<br />

exceptions to this general idea.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!