08.04.2018 Views

113992242-Dravidian-Settlements-in-Ceylon-and-the-Beginnings-of-the-Kingdom-of-Jaffna-By-Karthigesu-Indrapala-Complete-Phd-Thesis-University-of-London-1965

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

390<br />

as <strong>the</strong> mercenaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> later <strong>in</strong>vaders like Chan rabhnu<br />

probably established settlements <strong>in</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> North-central<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. The Clavawa has references to S<strong>in</strong>halese Vanni r<strong>in</strong>ces<br />

rul<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Rj raha <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> thirteenth century. Probably <strong>the</strong>re<br />

were also Vanni chieft <strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Taniils <strong>in</strong> this area at that<br />

time. It is difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e with t e evidence at our<br />

disposal how extensive or strong <strong>the</strong> new <strong>Dravidian</strong> settle ents<br />

were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> thirteenth century. The North-central Prov<strong>in</strong>ce was<br />

lar ely ab<strong>and</strong>oned after <strong>the</strong> thirteenth century by both Tamils<br />

<strong>and</strong> S<strong>in</strong>halese <strong>and</strong> only a few pockets <strong>of</strong> Tamil <strong>and</strong> S<strong>in</strong>halese<br />

settl ments seem to have been left. In <strong>the</strong> thirteenth century<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Dravidian</strong>s were probably scattered all over <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong><br />

small groupá. These settlers have not left beh<strong>in</strong>d Tamil <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

or <strong>Dravidian</strong>-style temples. The only evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

settlement is found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local nomenclature. The disa earance<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier S<strong>in</strong>halese names s eaks both for a su den <strong>and</strong><br />

a violent occupation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area by <strong>the</strong> forei ners as well as<br />

for settle ent by Tamils after <strong>the</strong> total ab<strong>and</strong>onment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

area by <strong>the</strong> earli r settlers. Th retention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Taniil na es<br />

by <strong>the</strong> resent-day opulation which is largely S<strong>in</strong>balese- eak<strong>in</strong> ,<br />

shows that <strong>the</strong> Ta is, howev r small <strong>in</strong> number, bad cont<strong>in</strong>u d<br />

to live <strong>in</strong> this prov<strong>in</strong>ce till <strong>the</strong> ti e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>hale e resettlement-<br />

1. .C. . •, I, pt. , pp. 713-71k.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!