14.12.2012 Views

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

A new direction for the <strong>Yearbook</strong><br />

xii<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Although at more than 400 pages and 180,000 words in length, the seventh edition of the <strong>Yearbook</strong><br />

remains a thing of substance, something is missing this year; namely the Americas and Asia country<br />

and company entries. We took the decision to spread the <strong>Yearbook</strong>’s global company and country<br />

coverage across two years because of the relentless rise in what needs to be reported and the desire<br />

to report this in suitable detail meant that the single volume format was in danger of becoming<br />

unmanageable. This is best illustrated by the word count, which has climbed from 167,000 for the<br />

1999-2000 edition to 228,000 for the 2004-<strong>2005</strong> edition. As a result, the country and coverage will<br />

alternate between Europe, the Middle East and Africa (<strong>2005</strong>-<strong>2006</strong>, 2007-2008, etc) and the Americas<br />

and Asia (<strong>2006</strong>-2007, 2008-2009, etc), while retaining full annual coverage of the major international<br />

players and enhancing the global overview section. The latter reflects the popularity of our annual<br />

appraisal of the state of play by country and by company and as this edition demonstrates, will remain<br />

uncompromisingly global in its outlook. In addition, some readers have commented that not enough<br />

happens each year to justify some of the annual country entries, so a biennial approach will help to<br />

address this.<br />

We believe that these changes will significantly improve the value of the <strong>Yearbook</strong> for its readers and<br />

welcome any feedback about this and any other areas where you have suggestions to make.<br />

Another year of mixed fortunes…<br />

2004 turned out to be a distinctly more grisly year than it appeared to be twelve months ago. A<br />

number of contracts were wound up in Africa meaning that there was a net gain of people served by<br />

the private sector of just four million for the year. The early prognosis for <strong>2005</strong> was similarly bleak, with<br />

major contracts ending in Bolivia and Tanzania in what can only be described as controversial<br />

circumstances. Although the fate of a number of major concessions remain in the balance, a series of<br />

major contract awards in Russia, Algeria and India, along with the continued strength of the Chinese<br />

market and minor awards in, for example, the USA, Portugal and the UK meant that at the time of<br />

writing, net contract gains for <strong>2005</strong> stand at nearly 21 million. While this remains a far cry from the<br />

halcyon years between 1997 and 2000, it represents a welcome return to resilience.<br />

Those years were marked by the award of major concessions (Manila and Sofia for example), funded<br />

through hard currency debt and often via a tendering process managed by the IFC. The current<br />

generation of contracts sees a far greater reliance on local funding and a focus on countries where<br />

sufficient confidence in the politics of private sector involvement exists. While this is fine in its own<br />

right, it does not fully address the issue of how to get water and sanitation services to the unserved<br />

urban centres in developing economies, let alone mobilising new sources of funding.<br />

…as companies continue to shift their strategies…<br />

AWG progresses in withdrawing from international markets (creating at least one new local player in<br />

the process) and rumours abound about RWE’s international water strategy and what this in turn will<br />

mean for Thames and American <strong>Water</strong> Works. Suez seeks to realign its activities in Latin America and<br />

Asia (while remaining committed to China), and Veolia settles into its more focussed set of<br />

international priorities. Caution is thus the collective watchword of the major players, in particular due<br />

to the lessons learnt about the risks of financing hard currency debt through soft currency utility bills.<br />

As the quasi-global strategy ebbs, the emergence of regional and local players continues apace.<br />

Divestitures create opportunities, with AWG’s sale of its Oslo concession to Sweden’s Läckeby making<br />

the latter company into a Scandinavian market leader, while RWE is set to sell its Chilean concessions<br />

to local investors. The emergence of new players in Singapore, Malaysia and China continues as it<br />

does in Spain and Portugal. Meanwhile the long anticipated rationalisation of various water interests in<br />

Italy has helped AMGA and ACEA build their domestic presence and Hera shows no intention of<br />

lagging behind.<br />

…and equities acquire a scarcity value<br />

A number of major sectoral reviews published by leading investment banks in the UK, USA and Asia<br />

have highlighted the conceptual attractions behind investing in the water sector. The endearingly<br />

optimistic nature of ‘modern’ equity analysis is reflected in some beguilingly straight line projections for<br />

<strong>Pinsent</strong> <strong>Masons</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!