14.12.2012 Views

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PART 2: COUNTRY ANALYSIS<br />

City Study: Moscow<br />

<strong>Water</strong> and sewerage services are provided by Mosvodokanal. <strong>Water</strong> usage by domestic customers<br />

rose from 3.68 million m 3 per annum in 1992 to 3.88 million m 3 in 1995, while usage by industry fell<br />

from 1.05 million m 3 per annum to 0.61 million m 3 per annum over the same period of time. Likewise,<br />

water discharge by domestic customers rose from 2.29 million m 3 per annum to 2.38 million m 3 per<br />

annum, while falling from 0.70 million m 3 per annum to 0.43 million m 3 per annum for industrial and<br />

power customers. It appears likely that the monitoring of the discharge of industrial effluents has<br />

eased during this period. The quality of drinking water has been affected by drives to develop land<br />

surrounding water abstraction areas to the point where these sources are being materially<br />

contaminated. In consequence, while 1.2% of drinking water samples failed bacterial contamination<br />

tests in 1991, this rose to 3.4% by 1995. The failure rate on chemical criteria for recreational water<br />

bodies rose from 48% in 1991 to 72% in 1995 and from 53% to 65% for bacterial contamination over<br />

the same period. Meanwhile, a collapse in living standards for the majority of the population has taken<br />

place to the point where environmental concerns are overshadowed by apparently more immediate<br />

concerns. In 2002, Mosvodokanal claimed that it was owed R30 million (€965,000) in unpaid bills by<br />

regional administrations and municipal institutions. At the beginning of 2002 Mosvodokanal cut the<br />

supply of drinking water to several towns in the Moscow region. Mosvodokanal in turn owes R70<br />

million (€2.25 million) to energy supplier Mosenergo. In the meantime Mosvodokanal has filed a<br />

counterclaim against Mosenergo for R16.9 million (€540,000).<br />

Private sector contracts awarded (Please see the relevant company entry for<br />

details)<br />

Location Contract Company<br />

Moscow 11 year, wastewater build, O&M WTE<br />

Moscow 12.5 year, wastewater build, O&M WTE<br />

Moscow 13 year, water BOOT Suez/WTE<br />

Private sector company operations (Please see the relevant company entry for details)<br />

Company Parent company (country)<br />

Population served<br />

<strong>Water</strong> Sewerage Total<br />

WTE EVN (Austria) 1,000,000 650,000 1,650,000<br />

Suez Suez (Austria) 1,000,000 0 1,000,000<br />

RUS IES (Russia) 2,221,000 N/A 2,221,000<br />

Novogor-Prikamye Interros (Russia) 1,096,000 221,000 1,317,000<br />

Rosvodokanal Alpha (Russia) 487,000 487,000 487,000<br />

Syzran Vodocanal Syzran Vodocanal (Russia) 163,000 121,000 163,000<br />

Sources:<br />

Oldfield, J (1999). The Environmental Impact of Transition–a case study of Moscow city. Geographical Journal, 165, 222-231.<br />

GWI (2004) A new Russian Revolution, Global <strong>Water</strong> Intelligence (5,8), Media Analytics, Oxford, UK<br />

OECD (2004) Overview of Domestic and International Private Companies Operating in the Utilities Sector in Russian<br />

Federation, OECD, Paris<br />

172 <strong>Pinsent</strong> <strong>Masons</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2005</strong> – <strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!