14.12.2012 Views

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART 4: APPENDIX 2: PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION<br />

here, along with liaising with the regulators to ensure that such information is channelled in a<br />

controlled manner.<br />

Regulators and regulation<br />

Independent regulators are essential. As the UK experience has shown, regulation is not cheap<br />

(Ofwat is arguably an industry in itself) and it takes time for a regulator to know its market. It<br />

places a great emphasis on efficiency and meeting targets, both of which minimise the scope for<br />

corruption. In Scotland, the <strong>Water</strong> Commissioner is adopting a similar approach with the stateheld<br />

Scottish <strong>Water</strong>, demonstrating that regulation and reporting can take place within the public<br />

sector. This experience has highlighted why municipal entities need to be exposed to<br />

independent regulation.<br />

Regulation of a suitably robust nature (and allied reporting systems) needs to be in place before<br />

the privatisation process starts. Perhaps the initiation of such schemes ought to mark the<br />

effective beginning of the privatisation process. These reporting systems need to be developed<br />

on a tripartite basis (economic regulation, water quality and service delivery and environmental<br />

protection and resource management), ensuring that the various reporting functions operate<br />

independently of each other, so as not to compromise their separate interests. To address the<br />

cost of regulation, the World Bank, regional development banks and other interested parties<br />

should support the setting up of regional regulators, along with supporting capacity building for<br />

analytical and comparative work. These regulators would be responsible for developing<br />

comparative data on a regional basis, and assisting the implementation of a national regulator<br />

for each country where PSP is about to take place.<br />

Opening windows of transparency<br />

If confidence in the bidding process is undermined by its perceived opacity, then windows of<br />

transparency ought to be opened at suitable stages in the process as outlined in this section,<br />

allowing stakeholder scrutiny and building external confidence in the process.<br />

Too much is said about commercial secrecy. As CR notes, healthy competition is the scourge of<br />

corruption. Free economies deserve freedom of disclosure and the right to make a free choice<br />

based on information which stakeholders and NGOs can also have confidence in. A number of<br />

mechanisms exist which can be used to ensure the generation of such information is part of the<br />

privatisation process. For example, certification with the ISO 9000 (total quality management)<br />

and ISO 14000 (environmental management systems) standards, externally audited by an<br />

international agency ought to be required within a given timeframe.<br />

Externally recognised and monitored operational quality criteria have a significant role to play in<br />

the capacity and confidence building process. This means that the OECD Convention needs to<br />

be an integral part of each process (the 1998 Convention on Combating Bribery in International<br />

Business Transactions), placing pressure upon countries that have yet to adopt it. The World<br />

Bank’s 1996 Guidelines for Procurement, under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits, remain valid and<br />

need to be seen as an effective sanction against potential transgressors.<br />

Concern has also been expressed about perceived information asymmetries that favour private<br />

sector companies with a wide experience of market conditions and strategies. This can lead to<br />

stakeholders to regard the bidding (and re-negotiation) process with scepticism. These<br />

concerns are best addressed through a capacity building programme designed to ensure that<br />

local and national interests are suitably addressed, while a formal disclosure system before,<br />

during and after the privatisation programme allows stakeholders to have the information they<br />

need to be able to constructively engage with the service provider, the private sector and the<br />

regulators.<br />

Many of the mechanisms called for are necessary for building up competitive domestic markets<br />

along with the ability to compete effectively on a regional basis. Therefore, the capacity building<br />

exercise will benefit the local private sector as well as the regulators and NGOs.<br />

386 <strong>Pinsent</strong> <strong>Masons</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!