14.12.2012 Views

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART 1: <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>2006</strong> OVERVIEW<br />

privatisation. The average contract size has eased since 2000, reflecting a trend towards<br />

smaller, more localised contracts and fewer of the major privatisations such as Buenos Aries,<br />

Manila and Jakarta.<br />

Distribution of contract awards – by region<br />

<strong>Water</strong> 1985-99 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04<br />

Europe 39.86 1.57 17.35 24.77<br />

Americas 0.00 20.73 50.19 22.64<br />

Asia 1.49 9.56 53.70 48.66<br />

ME & Africa 7.25 1.28 14.81 13.62<br />

Total 48.60 33.14 136.05 109.69<br />

Wastewater 1985-99 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04<br />

Europe 55.03 3.54 18.41 23.27<br />

Americas 0.00 9.73 34.09 12.11<br />

Asia 0.00 0.30 3.48 30.98<br />

ME & Africa 1.50 0.00 1.96 5.69<br />

Total 56.53 13.57 57.94 72.05<br />

Europe’s figures are marked by two especial trends; the privatisation of the water and sewage<br />

companies of England & Wales in 1989 and gradual impact of the Galli Law in Italy from 1999.<br />

While contract activity has decreased materially in the Americas since 2000, it has remained at<br />

least steady in Asia due to the expansion of the market in China and the emergence of the<br />

market in India and has materially increased in Africa and the Middle East.<br />

Distribution of contract awards – by awardee<br />

<strong>Water</strong> 1985-99 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04<br />

Local – Developed 39.86 0.00 4.08 16.29<br />

Local – Developing 0.60 4.88 26.20 26.04<br />

Expatriate Chinese 0.00 0.00 8.99 5.35<br />

Multinational 8.14 28.56 96.14 62.22<br />

Total 48.60 33.14 136.05 109.69<br />

Wastewater 1985-99 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04<br />

Local – Developed 55.03 1.66 4.56 12.97<br />

Local – Developing 0.00 0.30 17.20 18.96<br />

Expatriate Chinese 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63<br />

Multinational 1.50 11.61 36.28 37.48<br />

Total 56.53 13.57 57.94 72.05<br />

It appears that a shift away from contracts being awarded to multinational companies to local<br />

and expatriate companies is taking place. This shift is even more dramatic when you consider<br />

reflects at Brazil’s SABESP (partly privatised in 1996) served 24 million people. While these<br />

changes are in part due to the problems encountered by multinational companies since the mid<br />

1990s, especially regarding political and foreign exchange risk, it also demonstrates that local<br />

capacity building is starting to have an effect.<br />

This is not necessarily a good thing as while local or expatriate funding obviates exchange rate<br />

risk, it plays a limited role in mobilising new sources of funding needed to attain the Millennium<br />

Development Goals as expatriate funding has only been identified being used in China to date.<br />

In China, legislation was passed in 2002 outlawing fixed returns on investment for water or<br />

wastewater projects by held and operated by international entities. As a result Berlinwasser and<br />

RWE Thames sold back their holdings in two projects back to state held entities. This legislation<br />

does not apply to projects funded and operated by domestic companies and companies such as<br />

38<br />

<strong>Pinsent</strong> <strong>Masons</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!