14.12.2012 Views

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART 4: APPENDIX 2: PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION<br />

The municipality controls the assets, while the private sector controls their operation. Risk<br />

elements start emerging, with the private sector now dealing directly with the customers, and<br />

thus this can be the focus of discontent. Examples include: water and sewerage management in<br />

urban areas of Guinea (SEEG, Bouygues/Veolia) and water services for Dakar and other major<br />

urban areas of Senegal (DSE, Bouygues).<br />

BOOT/BOT/BOO concession<br />

Time horizon 10-30 years, up to 95 Ownership Public<br />

Customer Govt/Municipal Investment Private<br />

Cash flow profile Pay on completion Operation Private<br />

Construction risk High Tariff collection Public<br />

Regulatory risk Low<br />

Asset ownership under the three concession types<br />

BOO Build Own Operate Concessionaire retains ownership of assets<br />

permanently<br />

BOT Build/Operate/Transfer Hands over assets at end of concession, never<br />

having owned them<br />

BOOT Build Own Operate Transfer Hands over ownership of assets at end of<br />

concession<br />

Concession contracts call for a full understanding of the financial risks involved with the project.<br />

These concession contracts can be regarded as the classic water privatisation model. Examples<br />

include: water treatment BOO for Riverland (Australia, United Utilities) and a sewage treatment<br />

works BOOT for Puerto Vallarta (Mexico, Biwater). The UK’s Private Finance Initiative sewage<br />

treatment contracts are being awarded on a BOT basis.<br />

In many cases, the concession award takes place with the splitting of the water and sewerage<br />

entity into a service provision entity and an asset owning entity. The concession winner gains<br />

control of at least a significant proportion of the service provision entity’s equity, along with<br />

management control. The municipality in turn retains at least a controlling stake in the asset<br />

owning entity. The latter entity is subsequently responsible for the extant assets and new assets<br />

are vested into this entity at an agreed date.<br />

Full utility concession<br />

Time horizon 20-30 years Ownership Public<br />

Customer Retail Customer Investment Private<br />

Cash flow profile Subject to market risk Operation Private<br />

Construction risk Low Tariff collection Private<br />

Regulatory risk High if politics volatile<br />

In this case, the private sector is allowed to get on with upgrading and operating the services,<br />

while developing new assets for handing over to the municipalities in the longer term. There<br />

have been mixed results to date, but some outstanding successes such as Metro Manila in the<br />

Philippines. Examples include: water and sewerage operations for Buenos Aires (Argentina,<br />

Aguas Argentinas) and water provision for Malacca (Malaysia, VE).<br />

Asset sale<br />

Time horizon In perpetuity Ownership Private<br />

Customer Retail Customer Investment Private<br />

Cash flow profile Subject to market risk Operation Private<br />

Construction risk Very low Tariff collection Private<br />

Regulatory risk Very high<br />

378 <strong>Pinsent</strong> <strong>Masons</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!