14.12.2012 Views

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

£2bn was achieved by increased efficiency and customers are now seeing the benefits of the<br />

improvement programme during this period, with continuing improvements in drinking water<br />

quality and the water environment.<br />

Investment spending, moreover, is planned to continue at these levels during AMP4 and<br />

beyond.<br />

In Scotland, however, there is less ground for optimism, with the first programme of work under<br />

the unified Scottish <strong>Water</strong> being heavily back-end loaded, with the prospect of a worrying carryover<br />

of uncompleted work distorting the market in the next O&S period.<br />

European regulatory framework<br />

In the EU generally, change is being driven by the staged implementation of the <strong>Water</strong><br />

Framework Directive (WFD) and the rolling revision of the Drinking <strong>Water</strong> Directive (DWD),<br />

which will impact most heavily on the countries of central and eastern Europe.<br />

In part, this is a reflection of European society’s rising expectations on responsible use of<br />

natural resources and increasingly effective environmental management. At the policy level, it<br />

also derives from the European Commission’s own agenda for a managed response, to climate<br />

change, sustainability issues and Millennium Development Goals objectives, pointing to a<br />

further extension of regulation.<br />

This could be good for the industry, but it signals yet more changes in market conditions, and<br />

industry lobbying efforts must be directed at ensuring the outcome is appropriate, proportional<br />

and manageable. The role of the industry supply base will be critical as it will be the prime<br />

source of the efficiencies demanded by the regulators.<br />

The impact of the WFD will be far-reaching, with consequences not readily foreseeable. It has a<br />

momentum of its own, data accumulated in the course of its progressive implementation feeding<br />

into further detailed policy formulations that are as yet merely outline objectives under the WFD<br />

banner. It will have a ripple effect, too, on other regulations, such as those governing bathing<br />

water quality, groundwater protection and urban wastewater treatment, and will trigger the<br />

revision of other EU policies, such as pollution prevention, soil protection and priority<br />

substances among others.<br />

The DWD, too, will have further implications elsewhere in the course of its revision, particularly,<br />

for example, for regulations covering materials in contact with drinking water, which will<br />

inevitably raise concerns for the effects on the equipment and process design segments of the<br />

industry.<br />

Regulation, however, if it is to underpin environmental improvement , can only work when<br />

backed by effective and efficient monitoring and enforcement procedures, under an overarching<br />

and rigorous penalty regime, which is a determination yet to be demonstrated by the<br />

Commission.<br />

The International arena<br />

A primary influence in the international market is the attempt through the Millennium<br />

Development Goals to halve by 2015 the proportion of the world’s population without access to<br />

safe drinking water and adequate sanitation. In addition, the Global <strong>Water</strong> Partnership<br />

estimates that, in order to provide full water and sewerage access, and at least primary<br />

wastewater treatment, for urban populations, investment will have to reach $180bn a year until<br />

2025. Even allowing for the inevitable huge investment shortfalls, this amounts to an enormous<br />

surge in market potential for the UK water and wastewater industry in the coming years.<br />

The scale of the problem is evident from the wide variations in regional need and the disparities<br />

they reflect between the developing and the developed worlds, although even in the latter they<br />

reflect very large-scale requirements. The USA, for example, needs to invest upwards of<br />

$300bn to upgrade its ageing water infrastructure and within the EU the requirements of EU<br />

ii<br />

<strong>Pinsent</strong> <strong>Masons</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2005</strong>-<strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!