14.12.2012 Views

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

2005 - 2006 - Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UKRAINE PART 2: COUNTRY ANALYSIS<br />

Ukraine<br />

<strong>Water</strong> and sewerage connections in urban areas<br />

Size of urban area <strong>Water</strong> Sewerage Distribution loss<br />

>300,000 88% 81% 27%<br />

100,000–300,000 92% 85% 32%<br />

50,000–100,000 75% 48% 34%<br />

10,000–50,000 74% 45% 23%<br />

In urban areas, the average water delivery is for 17 hours per day, with 94% of drinking water samples<br />

meeting health standards. Some improvement in unaccounted water levels has been noted, with a<br />

fall from 47% in 1997 to 44% by 2001.<br />

Service connections, 2001 Urban Rural<br />

<strong>Water</strong> connection 83% 26%<br />

Sewerage connection 57% 9%<br />

Most wastewater treatment plants were built between 1960 and 1980, with an average age of about<br />

25 years. In cities with a population above 100,000 people, about 80% of wastewater treated is<br />

subject to secondary treatment, while in smaller towns, the average is at about 45%. Many of these<br />

plants only operate to primary treatment standard due to lack of maintenance and the need for<br />

chemicals and power.<br />

Cost recovery and realities<br />

Billed revenues for Ukraine from centralised water and wastewater services accounted for €507<br />

million in 2001, with water fees rising 16 times more than other consumer goods and services (1.46<br />

million times against 89 thousand times) between 1992 and 2001. Although cost recovery has been a<br />

official aim since 1998, this remains some way away, with the average duration for collecting bills<br />

varying between 11.0 and 16.9 months between 1997 and 2001. In 2001, billings received met 77%<br />

of operating costs for water and wastewater services. Tariffs in 2001 for water and wastewater were<br />

the equivalent of US$0.158 per m 3 , implying an average monthly spending of US$1.27 per person.<br />

In 2002, the Helsinki Commission (Holcomb) noted that municipal and industrial wastewater treatment<br />

at the city of Lvov needs to be improved urgently. The sewerage network is in poor condition and<br />

needs renovation to avoid groundwater pollution. A US$40 million project (€40.5 million) is expected<br />

to start in the near future and will focus on the city’s discharges.<br />

Private sector responses<br />

The first international loan for a water or wastewater project did not take place until May 1999. The<br />

EBRD has lent €26.5 million to Zaporizhzhia Vodokanal, the water and sewerage entity serving the<br />

city of Zaporizhzhia’s 500,000 people. The loan is being used to upgrade the city’s water and sewage<br />

treatment works to improve the quality of the city’s drinking water and to ease discharges into the<br />

Dnieper basin. The city was selected because it charges for its services on a cost recovery basis and<br />

is financially self-sufficient.<br />

Sources:<br />

DEPA (2003) Environmental Financing Strategy for the Municipal <strong>Water</strong> and Wastewater Sectors in the Ukraine. DEPA /<br />

DANCEE, Copnhagen, Denmark<br />

OECD (2004) Urban <strong>Water</strong> Reform in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia: Progress Since the Almaty Ministerial<br />

Conference, OECD, Paris, France<br />

OECD (2004) Affordability, Social Protection, and Public Participation in Urban <strong>Water</strong> Sector Reform in Eastern Europe,<br />

Caucasus and Central Asia, OECD, Paris, France<br />

202 <strong>Pinsent</strong> <strong>Masons</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2005</strong> – <strong>2006</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!