30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

488<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

489<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

490<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

491<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

6 A 7 8 0 0 remove "Ac<strong>co</strong>rding to literature" and start with "The range of<br />

atmospheric ……."<br />

(Ronald Hutjes, Alterra)<br />

6 A 7 8 7 12 Bearing in mind this is for policy makers, this point <strong>co</strong>uld benefit<br />

from greater emphasis.Without <strong>co</strong>herent polices and measures from<br />

Governments, there will be insufficient incentives to switch<br />

inverstment from high carbon to low carbon technologies. The link<br />

with the sentence around lines 23-24 on the need for a strong Govt<br />

role would help.<br />

(Government of UK)<br />

6 A 7 8 7 9 The statement "can be delivered by a portfolio of technologies"<br />

gives the impression that GHG emissions can be reduced by<br />

technological intervention alone. Therefore this statement should be<br />

revised to "can be delivered by a portfolio of policies and measures.<br />

(Government of Japan)<br />

6 A 7 8 7 12 Not sure this para does justice to the barriers issue. Related to para<br />

above, is the projected investment sufficient to deliver the number<br />

of new installations required?<br />

(Government of Environment Canada)<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

explanation is needed<br />

Ch 3 to –propose new wording<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

mitigation<br />

measures to be<br />

implemented.<br />

(4)<br />

ACC Accepted.<br />

(4)<br />

TIA; maybe move line 23-24 up<br />

see ch 4 text proposal<br />

Noted. We will<br />

keep the<br />

sentence about<br />

“strong<br />

government<br />

role” at the end<br />

but will<br />

emphasize the<br />

importance of<br />

policies<br />

incentive in the<br />

upper<br />

paragraph.<br />

(4)<br />

REJ, but see A-489 Accepted.<br />

(4)<br />

See A-489; for LT not much<br />

more can be said<br />

Noted. We will<br />

keep the<br />

sentence about<br />

“strong<br />

government<br />

role” at the end<br />

but will<br />

emphasize the<br />

Page 125 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!