30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

496<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

497<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

498<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

499<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

500<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

501<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

6 A 7 11 7 12<br />

(Jose Etcheverry, David Suzuki Foundation)<br />

It would be helpful to provide a more precise indication of the<br />

'relatively short period.'<br />

(Government of UK)<br />

6 A 7 11 7 11 The following wording is proposed: However, scenarios imply that<br />

large numbers of new low-emission installations, …<br />

(Government of Austria)<br />

6 A 7 13 7 21 Again, how feasible are the carbon intensities improvements<br />

needed to reach lower stabilization levels?<br />

(Government of Environment Canada)<br />

6 A 7 14 7 15 Inappropriate tense. Proposed rewording:"Energy efficiency plays a<br />

key role for all regions and timescales."<br />

6<br />

F<br />

4<br />

(Government of Environment Canada)<br />

A 7 15 0 0 Figure <strong>SPM</strong>.4: This is a very useful figure. It would be even more<br />

useful to a wider audience and outside the WG3 <strong>SPM</strong> if the figure<br />

in the <strong>SPM</strong> referred to ppm CO2eq stabilisation levels rather than<br />

W/m2. The translation between those two units <strong>co</strong>uld be done in<br />

the TS to provide a link between the original studies and their<br />

presentation in a format relevant to policy-makers.<br />

(Andy Reisinger, TSU IPCC Synthesis Report)<br />

6 A 7 15 7 15 Delete "in scenarios".<br />

(Government of Environment Canada)<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

REJ; leave details to chapter/TS 3,4,TS Accepted. Text<br />

to be revised<br />

(3)<br />

Accepted.<br />

See A-494 (better) Accepted and<br />

added<br />

“widespread<br />

implementation<br />

”.<br />

REJ; not more can be said Rejected. It<br />

requires a long<br />

text. But it is<br />

discussed in<br />

Chapter 4.<br />

(4)<br />

(4)<br />

(4)<br />

ACC Accepted.<br />

(4)<br />

ACC Accepted.<br />

Figure is being<br />

revised by<br />

Chapter 3 team.<br />

(4)<br />

ACC, but we need to make clear<br />

this is a least-<strong>co</strong>st <strong>co</strong>ntext<br />

Ch 4 <strong>co</strong>mment not to the point.<br />

Rejected. We<br />

are sure that<br />

more scenarios<br />

are <strong>co</strong>nsidering<br />

these changes.<br />

Nevertheless,<br />

Page 128 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!