SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
para<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-66 5<br />
he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-67 5<br />
he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-68 5<br />
he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
365<br />
5<br />
he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
<strong>co</strong>ncentration levels. The authors should potentially clarify the<br />
statement of B.5. The key point is that is that emissions must peak<br />
and decline to meet any long-term <strong>co</strong>ncentration level and that the<br />
lower the level the more quickly this peak and decline must occur.<br />
The discussion <strong>co</strong>uld be improved to provide greater clarity, more<br />
information, more linkage to the material in Table <strong>SPM</strong>.1, and<br />
more <strong>co</strong>ntext within which to interpret the information (e.g., why<br />
450 ppmv, overshoot issues). U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
B 5 4 5 5 Clarify. Sentence is unclear. “For achieving … should lead to<br />
peaking” is awkward/<strong>co</strong>nfusing. U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
B 5 4 5 5 Clarify. Sentence is unclear. “For achieving … should lead to<br />
peaking” is awkward/<strong>co</strong>nfusing. U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
B 5 4 0 0 “…implemented…When? Timeframe?” The authors should<br />
potentially clarify the statement of B.5. The key point is that is that<br />
emissions must peak and decline to meet any long-term<br />
<strong>co</strong>ncentration level and that the lower the level the more quickly<br />
this peak and decline must occur. The discussion <strong>co</strong>uld be<br />
improved to provide greater clarity, more information, more linkage<br />
to the material in Table <strong>SPM</strong>.1, and more <strong>co</strong>ntext within which to<br />
interpret the information (e.g., why 450 ppmv, overshoot issues).<br />
U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
A 5 5 0 6 specify what uncertainty is meant here: uncertainty about the <strong>co</strong>sts,<br />
uncertainty about the likelyhood to reach the stabilisation level<br />
(Ronald Hutjes, Alterra)<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
merging with para 6<br />
TIA; heading text to be deleted,<br />
but wording to be used for<br />
merging with para 6<br />
TIA; heading text to be deleted,<br />
but wording to be used for<br />
merging with para 6<br />
TIA; heading text to be deleted,<br />
but wording to be used for<br />
merging with para 6<br />
TIA; heading text to be deleted,<br />
but wording to be <strong>co</strong>nsidered for<br />
para 7<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
Page 93 of 348
Change language