SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1147<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1148<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1149<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
239<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
240<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
241<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1150<br />
para<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
29 A 15 35 0 36 The term "limited" should be clarified, since the Kyoto targets were<br />
intended to be limited; can the expected effects be related to the<br />
targets?<br />
(Stephen Sheppard, University of British Columbia)<br />
29 A 15 35 15 35 As there is virutually no chance that Kyoto's impact on global<br />
emissions is unlimited, replace "is likely to be limited" with "is<br />
limited".<br />
(Cédric PHILIBERT, International Energy Agency)<br />
29 A 15 35 15 36 How can this statement be inferred? The first <strong>co</strong>mmitment period<br />
has not even begun.<br />
It is not clear how it is decided whether "e<strong>co</strong>nomic impacts are<br />
likely to be small" or not.<br />
(Koji Kadono, Global Industrial and Social Progress Research<br />
Institute(GISPRI))<br />
29 B 15 35 15 35 ...institutional mechanisms. Please add: ", that may provide the<br />
foundation of future GHG reduction efforts"<br />
(Jean-Pascal van YPERSELE, Université catholique de Louvain<br />
(Belgium))<br />
29 B 15 35 15 36 To what extent does the effect of the first <strong>co</strong>mmitment period<br />
deviate from the original expectations (5,2 % of Annex-I<br />
emissions). To what extent is the limited effect caused by the nonratifying<br />
<strong>co</strong>untries and to what extent by other factors?<br />
(Government of European Community / European Commission)<br />
29 B 15 35 15 35 Rephrase. "The impact of the Kyoto Proto<strong>co</strong>l on global emissions<br />
in its first <strong>co</strong>mmitment period is likely to be limited and…" Setting<br />
the institutions and the process in motion may have a bigger effect<br />
on emissions after 2012.<br />
(Government of European Community / European Commission)<br />
29 A 15 36 0 0 Interesting to note that meeting of the targets of the KP (target<br />
years just after the AR4 publication year) is going to be dependent<br />
on the usage of the KP mechanisms on top of domestic measures<br />
(evidence from the EU and probably elsewhere)?<br />
(Rob Swart, MNP)<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
See A-1142<br />
REJ; it can also turn out to be<br />
zero<br />
See A-1142; statement is based<br />
on literature<br />
ACC, modify sentence<br />
See A-1142<br />
See B-239<br />
ACC; add sentences on CDM/JI<br />
(sentence in para 24 to be<br />
moved here)<br />
CDM will be mentioned in para<br />
28<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
Reject not<br />
needed in <strong>SPM</strong><br />
(13) CDM<br />
discussion,<br />
following on the<br />
Thursday<br />
Page 303 of 348
Change language