SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
SPM-
907
SPM-
216
SPM-
908
SPM-
909
SPM-
217
SPM-
218
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
urban areas that will become an inefficient energy systems. The
investment in transport policies must include in Carbon Market.
(Government of Spain)
16 A 12 34 12 34 add: "Measures to improve logistics and to shift goods transport to
the environmentally most efficient means of transport can reduce
GHG emissions significantly" Justification: Modal shift and
logistics measures have been forgotten to be mentioned
(Government of Germany)
16 B 12 34 12 34 Please add ", and are essential in the long term to reduce demand
for individual transportation".
(Jean-Pascal van YPERSELE, Université catholique de Louvain
(Belgium))
17 A 12 35 13 5 Buildings. To add - ¨ More use of bioclimatic aspects in new
buildings design, in order to save energy and reduce GHG
emissions¨
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)
22 A 13 35 13 38 Is the avoided deforestation potential also included under "forestry"
in table SPM2? If so change label "forestry" in table SPM2 to say
"forestry including avoided deforestation" or not if it is not
included, but then make clear in text here.
(Rachel Warren, University of East Anglia)
17 B 12 35 12 35 Buildings: The synergies that can be found with adaptation should
be mentioned here (ex: adaptation to heat waves and extreme events
can go hand in hand with better energy efficiency if designed from
the start)
(Jean-Pascal van YPERSELE, Université catholique de Louvain
(Belgium))
17 B 12 36 13 11 Change the order of paragraphs 17 nd 18. Rationale: first the
observed trands and then the range of policy options that are
available
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
DISCUSS
What does literature say about
goods transport; does this justify
an SPM statement?
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
5 We will
consider
Chapter is weak
on this. Will
revisit and
reconsider
whether worth
spot in SPM
REJ; policy prescriptive rejected
REJ; too detailed
ACC; add some text
REJ; logic is: first technical
options/ economic potential;
then policy
Page 240 of 348