SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
883<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
210<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
884<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
885<br />
para<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
15 A 12 22 12 23 It might be worthwhile to add one sentence, based on the TS, on the<br />
reasons for the <strong>co</strong>nsistent upwards trend and its projected<br />
<strong>co</strong>ntinuation. Ac<strong>co</strong>rding to the TS and underlying chapter, this<br />
includes greater demand for mobility with growing wealth, but also<br />
offsets in efficiency by greater use of individual transport and<br />
greater engine sizes. Transport is a key policy area and might<br />
warrant this additional detail.<br />
(Andy Reisinger, TSU IPCC Synthesis Report)<br />
15 B 12 22 12 27 This paragraph is disappointing, as it is limited to technological<br />
aspects of road vehicles. Aviation is not <strong>co</strong>vered. Urban planning<br />
and public transport are quickly mentioned in the following para,<br />
but they should be discussed more extensively, as they are very<br />
important in the long term (urban sprawl induces automobile<br />
transportation for a very long time.) Tourism is not mentioned.<br />
Bicycling is not mentioned.<br />
(Jean-Pascal van YPERSELE, Université catholique de Louvain<br />
(Belgium))<br />
15 A 12 23 12 23 To add:¨.....of efficient hybrid vehicles, more saver vehicles, and<br />
cleaner .... ¨<br />
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF<br />
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)<br />
15 A 12 24 12 27 "Comment. From my point of view, the prhase: -The development<br />
and demonstration of hydrogen powered fuel cells for vehicles has<br />
started, but deployment is likely to take a long time.- is un<strong>co</strong>rrect.<br />
In fact, I tink that this prase don't take in <strong>co</strong>nsideration the U.S.<br />
President’s Hydrogen Fuel Initiative, launched in 2003, the U.S.<br />
Policy Energy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-58, Title VIII<br />
Hydrogen) and the recent DOE's Hydrogen Goal-Setting<br />
Methodologies Report to Congress (August 2006).<br />
The Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 811 (Reports) states: -(a)<br />
Secretary.—Subject to subsection (c), not later than 2 years after<br />
the date of enactment of this Act, and triennially thereafter, the<br />
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report describing— (…) (4)<br />
progress, including progress in infrastructure, made toward<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
REJ; not more on reasons for<br />
growth; focus on solutions<br />
TIA in reformulating para,<br />
provided chapter gives enough<br />
information<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
rejected<br />
5 We are going to<br />
<strong>co</strong>ver aviation,<br />
urban planning,<br />
and public<br />
transport.<br />
UNCLEAR rejected<br />
DISCUSS; impression is that<br />
literature overall is less<br />
optimistic<br />
5 rejected<br />
Page 234 of 348