SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
976 opportunities.” Rationale: The assessment should not imply that
emissions reductions are an “all or nothing choice” with a decision
to be made between achieving “the” potential or doing nothing.
(U.S. Government
SPM-
977
SPM-
978
SPM-
979
SPM-
980
SPM-
981
SPM-
982
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
22 A 13 42 13 42 To add: ¨.....regulatory, voluntary, and financial incentives, skilled
human resources, institutional capacity,.....¨
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)
22 A 14 1 14 5 I suggest to include examples when talk about implemented
forestry mitigation options, because do more clear the idea
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)
22 A 14 1 14 1 Change "mitigation options" to "mitigation measures"
(Government of Finland)
22 A 14 1 14 1 "Properly designed and implemented forestry mitigation
options.....".The term “Properly designed…” is too general and may
be replaced or illustrated by mentioning specific options and
instruments which reduce vulnerability to climate change and
deliver other co-benefits.
(Government of India)
22 A 14 1 14 1 “are also effective” should be “might also be effective” U.S.
Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
23 A 14 5 14 9 Mitigation potential 2.2 Gt CO2-eq/yr by 2030 is given. “Potential
fossil fuel emission offsets from bioenergy crops and forest
products”. This is a rather high amount, would mean an increase
more than 50% to the present avoided emissions due to biomass
energy use (estimated to be 3.7 Pg CO2 or less in Ch 9 p. 29 lines
19-21 ). Increase should be given (in some way).
(Government of Finland)
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
REJ; not in line with chapter
UNCLEAR
ACC
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
chair
REJ; too detailed for SPM Agree with co
chair
REJ; this is well established
DISCUSS; this para has to be
moved to the energy supply
section and be strengthened to
become the bio energy
paragraph
TIA when reformulating
CG Bio
energy
Alternative txt
was submitted
to tsu
Para will be in
ch 11 section,
and will be
modified,
following
revision of bioenergy
section
Page 262 of 348