30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

140 Suggest adding—maybe in parentheses—that 60% over 35 years is<br />

about 1.7%/year, assuming a <strong>co</strong>nstant rate. U.S. Government<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-17 1 B 1 10 1 11 We propose to change the sentence to:"This has occurred because<br />

<strong>co</strong>ntinuous use of fossil fuel by an increasing world population.<br />

Increases in GDP per capita ..."<br />

(Government of Switzerland)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-18 1 B 1 10 0 0 Stating emissions growth since 1970 might be misinterpreted.<br />

Suggest adding—maybe in parentheses—that 60% over 35 years is<br />

1.7%/yr, assuming a <strong>co</strong>nstant rate. U.S. Government<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

141<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

142<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

143<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

144<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

1 A 1 11 1 12 replace ", while carbon intensity of energy did not change much"<br />

with "and declines of carbon intensity of energy", because Figure<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>.2 doesn't support the original statement in the period of 1973-<br />

1983"<br />

(Yuan Guo, Energy Research Institute, National Development and<br />

Reform Commission)<br />

1 A 1 11 1 12 "carbon intensity of energy did not change much" is applicable to<br />

1993-2003.<br />

(Toshihiko Masui, National Institute for Environmental Studies)<br />

1 A 1 11 1 12 Ac<strong>co</strong>rding to Chapter 3, carbon intensity of energy has decreased<br />

0.9% annually. This is quite a big change. Therefore, the<br />

<strong>co</strong>nclusion "…while carbon intensity of energy did not change<br />

much..." is not proper.<br />

(Government of China Meteorological Administration)<br />

1 A 1 12 1 14 Both clarity and balance are needed as to the basis of the share of<br />

global GHG emissions, in particular whether they are calculated an<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

wrong<br />

(1)<br />

TIA in reformulating See <strong>co</strong>mment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-137<br />

(1)<br />

REJ; not needed REJ: Math is<br />

wrong<br />

(1)<br />

TIA in reformulating; see also<br />

A-109<br />

TIA: Will<br />

include data and<br />

clarify text<br />

(1)<br />

See A-142 TIA: Will<br />

include data and<br />

clarify text<br />

CHECK 3 REJ: Long-term<br />

decarbonisation<br />

SINCE 1860 is<br />

0.9% but not for<br />

the period as of<br />

1970 (will be<br />

checked)<br />

(1)<br />

noted. Numbers<br />

in Ch3 <strong>co</strong>rrect.<br />

TIA; adding “annual is ok; rest<br />

not needed because already in<br />

(1)<br />

(3)<br />

ACC: “annual”<br />

Rest agree with<br />

Page 42 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!