30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

252 he<br />

ad<br />

in<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

253<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

1246<br />

g<br />

31<br />

he<br />

ad<br />

in<br />

g<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

20: the text has a very qualitative nature and does not provide<br />

<strong>co</strong>ncrete agenda items for the policymaker. Hence: relevance of<br />

current section E to the <strong>SPM</strong> is limited.<br />

(Government of European Community / European Commission)<br />

B 18 5 18 5 Integrating climate change “<strong>co</strong>nsiderations” into… U.S.<br />

Government<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

31 A 18 13 20 19 We propose to replace the text from line 13 to 19 with: "Policy<br />

reforms <strong>co</strong>nducive to sustainable development can often be found<br />

that simultaneously release mitigation options. Important examples<br />

are elimination of energy subsidises or other inefficiencies in the<br />

sectors. Regulations in the energy sector may be designed to<br />

promote <strong>co</strong>mpetition, and secure existence of efficient operators or<br />

fuels. Reforms should try to avoid a situation where machinery is<br />

outdated, for reasons such as high inflation and interest rates, policy<br />

uncertainty, etc." Furthermore we propose deletion of the text i line<br />

23-to 27 at page 18. The text from line 31 to 36 at page 19 may be<br />

reduced because it is mostly <strong>co</strong>vered in para 31. General <strong>co</strong>mment<br />

to paragraphs 31 and 32: The text in the draft represent flawed logic<br />

if one is not more careful a) in developing a <strong>co</strong>mmon thread and b)<br />

in highlighting that a bundle of studies (those subsequently cited,<br />

and graphed) represent examples. It is key i) to use the word reform<br />

(i.e. change in policy) rather than the word ‘policy’, and ii) to<br />

highlight that the win-win options relate both to existing policies<br />

(such as energy sector subsidies) and to the direction of the reform<br />

(removal of those subsidies). It has no informational <strong>co</strong>ntent, no<br />

educational value, to say that ‘fiscal policies can have a profound<br />

impact on emissions. But to say that fiscal policy reform is<br />

<strong>co</strong>nducive to a more efficient use of energy if either energy<br />

subsidies can be eliminated or if the investment climate can be<br />

improved to get more efficient machinery in place makes a lot of<br />

sense. Peer reviewed literature demonstrating the power of energy<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

REJ; this is relevant<br />

identical A-1245<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

DISCUSS 12 Relates to text<br />

clarifications.<br />

Can and will be<br />

dealt with. CH<br />

12 proposals<br />

Page 327 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!