SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
SPM-
506
SPM-
507
SPM-
508
SPM-
509
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
6 A 7 17 7 17 What means "also in combination with bioenergy"? If this relates to
CCS, this addition makes little sense; CCS is as valuable in
combination with fossil fuel use as with bioenergy. Also the
sentence is technically correct it gives the reader the impression that
CCS is preferable with biomass, which is not the case. A better
place to mention that CCS could be used with biomass is
(Cédric PHILIBERT, International Energy Agency)
6 A 7 17 0 0 Nowhere in the SOD is there any indication that CCS has been
discussed since the early 1970s (Nakicenovic can give more precise
information on this). Nowhere is there any indication that global
scenario building blocks, with the exception of global climatic
change risks, have scarcely changed since the early/mid-1970s. Is it
not important to mention the enormous inertia in our systems?
Surely this is an important element in the SPM?
(Michael Jefferson, World Renewable Energy Network &
Congresses)
6 A 7 17 7 17 Please delete "…also in combination with bioenergy". Because
bioenerby is a kind of renewable energy.
(Government of China Meteorological Administration)
6 A 7 17 0 18 We propose that the text is changed as follows: " For lower
stabilisation levels carbon intensity improvements need to be much
higher than historic IMPROVEMENTS:"
(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
REJ; this is in conformity with
SRCCS
REJ; see SRCCS
DISCUSSake a reference to
SRCCS, because many readers
are not familiar apparently
see ch 4 text proposal
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
(4)
Accepted.
Sentence will be
redrafted.
(4)
4 Partially
accepted. A
sentence stating
that present path
will not fulfil
Article 2 of
UNFCCC will
be added.
Rej; see SRCCS Rejected. We
are telling that
CCS should be
used with
biomass.
ACC
ch 4 proposal not justified
(4)
(4)
Rejected. It is
also true that the
historical
improvements
on carbon
intensity were
quite
insufficient to
mitigate climate
change.
(4)
Page 130 of 348