SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
SPM-
1035
SPM-
1036
SPM-
1037
SPM-
1038
SPM-
1039
SPM-
1040
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
0 A 14 32 0 0
(Taishi Sugiyama, CRIEPI)
suggest to add a new small paragraph such as " Public awareness is
essential to make consumers voluntarly implement these mitigation
options."
(Faouzi Senhaji, I.A.V. Hassan II (GERERE))
26 A 14 33 16 19 The order of paragraphs in this section might be revised. In
particular, putting carbon prices first, without referring to the capand-trade
system which drives much experience to date with carbon
prices, could be in a better place. I would suggest beginning with
teh overview (para 27), then looking at recent history of Kyoto
(para 29), followed by carbon price (para 26), technology (28) and
international (30).
(Harald Winkler, University of Cape Town)
26 A 14 33 14 34 Mitigation occurred in many businesses before a carbon price was
established, for example, 7 EU manufacturing facilities that emit
HFC-23 took mitigations actions for various reasons other than a
carbon price; the EU Chemical Industry reduced emissions during
the period from 1980 without a carbon price. It is, therefore,
incorrect to state that a Carbon price is "essential".
(Nick Campbell, ARKEMA SA)
26 A 14 33 14 33 It is suggested to add one paragraph which addresses relevant
barriers. Then the following policies may be helpful to overcome
these barriers.
(Government of China Meteorological Administration)
26 A 14 33 0 0 delete the first sentence-" Carbon pricing……confidence.". Reason:
the value of carbon pricing should be based on some specific
background or mechanism.
(Government of China Meteorological Administration)
26 A 14 33 14 40 This section suggests that a carbon price of U.S.$20 to $25 per
tCO2-eq would be sufficient to drive large shifts towards lowcarbon
technologies. Over what timescale? Does the recent
experience with the EU emissions trading scheme bear this out?
U.S. Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
DISCUSS; not worth a separate
para; but how can we bring it in
the SPM?
REJ; the logic is: if there are no
incentives, nothing will happen;
policies create incentives
See A-1024
ACC; add sentence
See A-1024
DISCUSS; is literature solid on
this? How much of this comes
from SRCCS?
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
13 Is and will be
better covered
in para 27
11 Reject. IEA ref.:
solid literature,.
To be checked
by ch 11.
Page 280 of 348