30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

189<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

190<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

191<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

778<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

779<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

780<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

11 B 11 28 11 35<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

The assumption on the loss of GDP by oil-exporting <strong>co</strong>untries on<br />

the basis of lower oil price is probably not so well established.<br />

(Government of Switzerland)<br />

11 B 11 28 11 28 Para speaks of many things that are not defined, e.g. leakage, 5-<br />

20% of what?, spill over. Some interpret leakage as the increasing<br />

and spill over as the decreasing effect of Annex I action on nonannex<br />

I <strong>co</strong>untries’ emissions.<br />

(Government of European Community / European Commission)<br />

11 B 11 28 11 28 For the Policy Maker/Lay Reader, define or explain briefly the<br />

term “carbon leakage” and why in footnote 10 there would be an<br />

“increase in emissions” due to “implementation of reductions in<br />

Annex I”. Use clarifying <strong>co</strong>nstruction. U.S. Government<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

11 A 11 29 11 29 replace "but <strong>co</strong>uld be lower due to diffusion of low-emission<br />

technology" by "but would be less if low-emissions technology is<br />

effectively diffused"<br />

(Government of The Netherlands)<br />

11 A 11 30 11 32 The affirmation: ¨(oil-exporting <strong>co</strong>untries can expect lower oil<br />

prices and GDP loss but results depend on aassumptions about<br />

annex - I policies and oil exporting <strong>co</strong>untry <strong>response</strong>s)¨ - isn´t in<br />

ac<strong>co</strong>rd with actual situation and the future perspectives.<br />

(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF<br />

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)<br />

11 A 11 30 11 31 As the WGIII Report page 72 line 22-23 indicates: "It is important<br />

to emphasize the uncertainties in estimating spill over effects." It<br />

would be useful to make this the opening line for this this section.<br />

As written in the underlying report, there are many different spill<br />

over effects, all of which depend on assumptions made, thus no<br />

models/study can reflect the full dynamics of all of the factors at<br />

play.<br />

The underlying report suggests that there is far more new literature<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

DISCUSS 11 REJ, This is a<br />

result of<br />

findings. See<br />

revised paras<br />

ACC both carbon leakage and<br />

spill-over will be defined in<br />

glossary<br />

REJ; definition in footnote<br />

should be clear<br />

(11)<br />

Agree<br />

(11)<br />

REJ<br />

(11)<br />

ACC See revised<br />

paras<br />

(11)<br />

REJ; that is what TAR said and<br />

there is no other literature<br />

ACC; reorder para so that new<br />

findings Are close to TAR<br />

findings<br />

See revised<br />

paras<br />

(11)<br />

ACC. This<br />

<strong>co</strong>mment major<br />

basis for<br />

revised paras<br />

(11)<br />

Page 207 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!