SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
189<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
190<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
191<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
778<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
779<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
780<br />
para<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
11 B 11 28 11 35<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
The assumption on the loss of GDP by oil-exporting <strong>co</strong>untries on<br />
the basis of lower oil price is probably not so well established.<br />
(Government of Switzerland)<br />
11 B 11 28 11 28 Para speaks of many things that are not defined, e.g. leakage, 5-<br />
20% of what?, spill over. Some interpret leakage as the increasing<br />
and spill over as the decreasing effect of Annex I action on nonannex<br />
I <strong>co</strong>untries’ emissions.<br />
(Government of European Community / European Commission)<br />
11 B 11 28 11 28 For the Policy Maker/Lay Reader, define or explain briefly the<br />
term “carbon leakage” and why in footnote 10 there would be an<br />
“increase in emissions” due to “implementation of reductions in<br />
Annex I”. Use clarifying <strong>co</strong>nstruction. U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
11 A 11 29 11 29 replace "but <strong>co</strong>uld be lower due to diffusion of low-emission<br />
technology" by "but would be less if low-emissions technology is<br />
effectively diffused"<br />
(Government of The Netherlands)<br />
11 A 11 30 11 32 The affirmation: ¨(oil-exporting <strong>co</strong>untries can expect lower oil<br />
prices and GDP loss but results depend on aassumptions about<br />
annex - I policies and oil exporting <strong>co</strong>untry <strong>response</strong>s)¨ - isn´t in<br />
ac<strong>co</strong>rd with actual situation and the future perspectives.<br />
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF<br />
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)<br />
11 A 11 30 11 31 As the WGIII Report page 72 line 22-23 indicates: "It is important<br />
to emphasize the uncertainties in estimating spill over effects." It<br />
would be useful to make this the opening line for this this section.<br />
As written in the underlying report, there are many different spill<br />
over effects, all of which depend on assumptions made, thus no<br />
models/study can reflect the full dynamics of all of the factors at<br />
play.<br />
The underlying report suggests that there is far more new literature<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
DISCUSS 11 REJ, This is a<br />
result of<br />
findings. See<br />
revised paras<br />
ACC both carbon leakage and<br />
spill-over will be defined in<br />
glossary<br />
REJ; definition in footnote<br />
should be clear<br />
(11)<br />
Agree<br />
(11)<br />
REJ<br />
(11)<br />
ACC See revised<br />
paras<br />
(11)<br />
REJ; that is what TAR said and<br />
there is no other literature<br />
ACC; reorder para so that new<br />
findings Are close to TAR<br />
findings<br />
See revised<br />
paras<br />
(11)<br />
ACC. This<br />
<strong>co</strong>mment major<br />
basis for<br />
revised paras<br />
(11)<br />
Page 207 of 348