SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
227<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
941<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
942<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
943<br />
para<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
over<strong>co</strong>me obstacles which impede the realisation of the<br />
technoligically and e<strong>co</strong>nomically viable option already available<br />
today. There are numerous examples for highly efficient and <strong>co</strong>steffective<br />
solutions, but the full market penetration takes years or<br />
decades without additional incentives to use these already available<br />
techniques. Thus the sentence should be replaced with: "There is a<br />
substantial additional potential from energy efficiency<br />
improvement available already today and instruments and markets<br />
need to be created to exploit these potentials. Some technologies<br />
may save up to 80% and more and many efficiency improvements<br />
can be implemented without additional <strong>co</strong>sts (high <strong>co</strong>nfidence).<br />
Beyond 2020 there will be a growing additional potential from the<br />
application of CCS and non-carbon technologies (medium<br />
<strong>co</strong>nfidence).<br />
(Government of Germany)<br />
20 B 13 21 13 21 If this is the first use of “CCS”, spell out the abbreviation and<br />
explain what this technology is and what promise it holds. U.S.<br />
Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
20 A 13 22 0 0 SF6 should also be mentioned here.<br />
(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)<br />
20 A 13 23 13 23 Remove <strong>co</strong>mma after the word "phase"<br />
(Government of MALAWI)<br />
21 A 13 25 13 25 Agriculture and forestry - very long <strong>co</strong>mpared with other important<br />
sectors as energy, industry, transport<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
<strong>co</strong>uld be that chapter 7 defines it<br />
differently than other chapters.<br />
As pointed out in the <strong>co</strong>mment,<br />
why suggest additional potential<br />
from efficiency after 2015,<br />
while the technical possibilities<br />
(at some <strong>co</strong>st) already exist?<br />
Maybe ch 7 means additional at<br />
net negative <strong>co</strong>st?<br />
Needs to be re<strong>co</strong>nciled with<br />
how we define e<strong>co</strong>nomic<br />
potential (at certain <strong>co</strong>st levels)<br />
REJ; it is not the first time; the<br />
first time it appears a footnote<br />
will be added that points to the<br />
SRCCS<br />
DISCUSS if SF6 is big enough<br />
to be mentioned here<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
rejecting the<br />
se<strong>co</strong>nd sentence<br />
because it is not<br />
supported by the<br />
chapter. On the<br />
third sentence<br />
retain additional<br />
energy<br />
efficiency since<br />
new technology<br />
is under<br />
development.<br />
Change noncarbon<br />
technologies to<br />
non-GHGemitting<br />
technologies.<br />
(7) 2015 split<br />
has not been<br />
approved by<br />
CLAs. Will not<br />
stay<br />
OK<br />
(7)<br />
7 SF6 should be<br />
mentioned.<br />
(7)<br />
ACC OK<br />
(7)<br />
REJ; only one para for agric and<br />
Noted. It is an<br />
one for forestry; after moving<br />
appropriate<br />
Page 250 of 348
Change language