30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-19 1 B 1 12 1 12<br />

energy changed significantly between 1973-1983, but that the<br />

change has not <strong>co</strong>ntinued in the past two decades. U.S. Government<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

Start the sentence with: "Currently, developped <strong>co</strong>untries ..."<br />

(Government of Switzerland)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-20 1 B 1 12 0 0 “Carbon intensity of energy did not change much” is a bit<br />

oversimplified. Figure <strong>SPM</strong>.2 shows that the carbon intensity of<br />

energy changed significantly between 1973-1983, but that the<br />

change has not <strong>co</strong>ntinued in the past two decades. U.S.<br />

Government<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

151<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

152<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

153<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

154<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

1 A 1 13 1 14 It would be useful to know whether the population and ghg<br />

emissions for developed <strong>co</strong>untries are declining since 1970 and<br />

what projections are until 2010 - 2020.<br />

(John Drexhage, International Institute for Sustainable<br />

Development)<br />

1 A 1 13 1 14 From fuel <strong>co</strong>mbustion, the share by Annex I is 60% instead of 46%<br />

(IEA, 2005). Please indicate if the number includes only fuel<br />

<strong>co</strong>mbustion or both fuel <strong>co</strong>mbustion and agriculture (LULUCF).<br />

This <strong>co</strong>mment applies to Figure 3 as well.<br />

(Government of China Meteorological Administration)<br />

1 A 1 13 1 13 for clarity please insert "now" before "hold", or specify year<br />

(Government of The Netherlands)<br />

1 A 1 13 1 15 From the viewpoint of policy relevance, there is no good reason to<br />

present only a binary relationship between developed/developing<br />

<strong>co</strong>untries emissions and population. Note that the previous<br />

sentence identified importance of a <strong>co</strong>mbination of other macrometrics<br />

- including GDP size and carbon intensity. The third<br />

sentence of the paragraph (and Fig <strong>SPM</strong>.3) should be expanded to<br />

en<strong>co</strong>mpass all these primary macro factors; or else deleted.<br />

(Government of Australia)<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

See A-145 See <strong>SPM</strong>-145<br />

(1)<br />

TIA in reformulating See <strong>SPM</strong>-145<br />

(1)<br />

TIA; projections will be added<br />

to fig 1, , but no population data<br />

(too much detail)<br />

ACC, say “CO2 from all<br />

sources”<br />

(1)<br />

1 Agree to check<br />

availability of<br />

data (Bill)<br />

(1)<br />

ACC<br />

(1)<br />

See A-145 See <strong>SPM</strong>-145<br />

(1)<br />

ACC; add E/GDP info and 1 ACC: develop a<br />

additional figure 3b<br />

sentence that<br />

addresses<br />

<strong>co</strong>ncern (see<br />

also <strong>SPM</strong>-21/B)<br />

by referring to<br />

direction of<br />

change (relative<br />

direction w.r.t.<br />

to past base year<br />

- Bill)<br />

Page 44 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!