SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
214<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
899<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
900<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
215<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
901<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
902<br />
para<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
16 B 12 29 12 0 Change “Achieving the emissions reduction potential” to<br />
“Realizing potential emissions reductions”. The assessment should<br />
not imply that emissions reductions are an “all or nothing choice”<br />
with a decision to be made between achieving “the” potential or<br />
doing nothing. U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
16 A 12 30 12 31 Add " and technological innovation" to the first sentense of para 16.<br />
Fuel cells technology, for example, needs technological<br />
breakthrough in addition to government policies for further<br />
development.<br />
(Koji Kadono, Global Industrial and Social Progress Research<br />
Institute(GISPRI))<br />
16 A 12 30 12 30 To add: ¨.....government and enterprises policies....¨<br />
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF<br />
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)<br />
16 B 12 30 12 31 Do fuel e<strong>co</strong>nomy standards have to be stringent and <strong>co</strong>ver the<br />
whole sector to work or will some standards drive other parts of the<br />
sector to self-regulate in order to avoid regulation? U.S.<br />
Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
16 A 12 31 12 33 "and easy availability of soft loans from the banks" may be added<br />
after the word 'in<strong>co</strong>mes' at the end of the sentence.<br />
(Government of Pakistan)<br />
16 A 12 32 12 33 delete: "… but effectiveness may drop with higher in<strong>co</strong>me"<br />
Justification: Taxes etc can be adapted to in<strong>co</strong>me increase<br />
(otherwise this measure would only make sense in "poor"<br />
<strong>co</strong>untries)<br />
(Government of Germany)<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
ACC; change “achieving” into<br />
“realising”; “emission reduction<br />
potential” is a perfectly fine<br />
term; no need to change<br />
REJ; this is a paragraph on<br />
policy<br />
REJ; message here is that<br />
without government policy not<br />
much will happen, as is<br />
illustrated by the current<br />
situation<br />
REJ; literature (e.g on US<br />
CAFÉ standards) shows that<br />
weak or partial standards are<br />
ineffective<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
intervention is<br />
not solved yet.<br />
accepted<br />
accepted<br />
rejected<br />
accepted<br />
REJ; too detailed rejected<br />
DISCUSS how strong is the<br />
literature on this in<strong>co</strong>me effect<br />
5 TIA, we will<br />
redraft<br />
Literature will<br />
be revisited. To<br />
be taken into<br />
ac<strong>co</strong>unt after<br />
revising chapter<br />
Page 238 of 348
Change language