SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
SPM-
226
SPM-
937
SPM-
938
SPM-
939
SPM-
940
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
19 B 13 19 13 19
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)
Mention emission trading somewhere in this para
(Jean-Pascal van YPERSELE, Université catholique de Louvain
(Belgium))
20 A 13 20 13 20 It is better to replace "Beyond 2015" with "In the long-term".
(Yuan Guo, Energy Research Institute, National Development and
Reform Commission)
20 A 13 20 13 22 The key findings from the IPCC Special report about CCS should
be mentioned here.
(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)
20 A 13 20 13 21 The statement: “…substantial additional potential from energy
efficiency improvements and application of CCS and non-carbon
process technologies…” . Here, it needs to specify additional to
what? Most of the energy efficiency measures and improvements in
non-carbon process technologies are already included in the future
baseline projections, even when of no climate intervention is
assumed in the analysis. In cases when the baseline analysis
assumes carbon mitigation instruments, such as for example the
Kyoto Protocol which is already ratified, the application of CCS is
also included to various extents in the baseline. Therefore
“substantial additional potential” beyond this would not exist.
Clarification on the “substantial additional potential” should be
made or this point no. 20 may be dropped.
(Government of India)
20 A 13 20 13 22 The statement as it stands is incorrect, since there are already today
large-scale efficiency improvements possible at economically
viable return rates. Thus market conditions should be created to
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
DISCUSS; is emissions trading
in the literature an important
policy instrument for the
industrial sector?
REJ; horizon of thia whole
section is 2030, so LT is not
appropriate
REJ; we cannot do that (no
space);
ACC making reference in
footnote to it
TIA, make sure it is made clear
that additional is compared to
what is in para 19 and that
potential is not already covered
in the baseline; add footnote to
all sector headings referring to
table 2
DISCUSS
There may be a problem with
respect to defining potential; it
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
7 Emissions
trading is
important, but
may not be
linked to
technology
uptake.
(7)
OK
OK
(7)
OK
(7)
7 Propose
accepting the
first sentence,
Page 249 of 348