30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

270 seems to <strong>co</strong>mpare per capita emissions in developed <strong>co</strong>untries with<br />

an increase in absolute emissions in developing <strong>co</strong>untries. Consider<br />

rephrasing this sentence to read "…, but average per capita<br />

emissions in developing <strong>co</strong>untries will remain substantially lower<br />

than per capita emissions in developed <strong>co</strong>untries."<br />

(Andy Reisinger, TSU IPCC Synthesis Report)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- 2 A 4 4 4 4 specify "substantially" e.g. "three to ten times" or "several times"<br />

271<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

272<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

273<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

274<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

275<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

276<br />

(Aviel VERBRUGGEN, University of Antwerp)<br />

2 A 4 4 4 5 This para repeats practice (see <strong>co</strong>mments on para 1) of singling out<br />

only the per capita emission factor for attention of policy makers.<br />

In terms of a policy relevant report, there is no foundation for<br />

narrowing the focus in this way. In the same way proposed for the<br />

treatment of recent historic trends <strong>co</strong>vered in para 1, the discussion<br />

of future trends in para 2 should deal with all the relevant macro<br />

factors dealt with in para 1.<br />

(Government of Australia)<br />

2 A 4 4 4 5 “……. will remain substantially higher...” – A range <strong>co</strong>uld be given<br />

by what magnitude, to highlight the large inequities.<br />

(Government of India)<br />

3 A 4 8 0 0 We propose that the acronym "SRES" is explained may be in a<br />

footnote - possibly also with some explanation regarding the use of<br />

these scenarios in the rest of the <strong>SPM</strong>.<br />

(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)<br />

2 A 4 5 4 5 Paragraph notes that two thirds of increase in emissions to 2030<br />

will <strong>co</strong>me from developing <strong>co</strong>untries, but notes per capita<br />

emissions in developed <strong>co</strong>untries will remain higher – should add a<br />

breakdown of percentage of total global emissions from developed<br />

and developing <strong>co</strong>untries, not just per capita figures.<br />

(Government of Australia)<br />

2 A 4 5 4 5 Insert ", than in Developing Countries" to make the meaning of the<br />

last phrase of the sentence clearer.<br />

(Government of Australia)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-46 2 B 4 5 4 5 The <strong>co</strong>ncerns should be about the growth of emissions globally, not<br />

about whether some <strong>co</strong>untry or region has more or less emissions<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

See A-267 See <strong>SPM</strong>-267<br />

(1)<br />

ACC; add E/GDP sentence 1 ACC: will be<br />

(with additional graph)<br />

dealt with in<br />

Chapter 1 and<br />

then Chairs can<br />

decide if in<br />

<strong>SPM</strong><br />

(1)<br />

See A-267 See <strong>SPM</strong>-267<br />

(1)<br />

ACC; glossary Glos ACC: glossary<br />

(1)<br />

Write SRES in<br />

DISCUSS; can this be shown in<br />

simple manner in graph?<br />

Otherwise leave to TS/chapter<br />

(1)<br />

full<br />

1 See <strong>SPM</strong>-267<br />

(1)<br />

ACC Acc<br />

(1)<br />

REJ; distributional info is very<br />

relevant for policy makers<br />

Agree with TSU<br />

(1)<br />

Page 68 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!