SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
para<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
270 seems to <strong>co</strong>mpare per capita emissions in developed <strong>co</strong>untries with<br />
an increase in absolute emissions in developing <strong>co</strong>untries. Consider<br />
rephrasing this sentence to read "…, but average per capita<br />
emissions in developing <strong>co</strong>untries will remain substantially lower<br />
than per capita emissions in developed <strong>co</strong>untries."<br />
(Andy Reisinger, TSU IPCC Synthesis Report)<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>- 2 A 4 4 4 4 specify "substantially" e.g. "three to ten times" or "several times"<br />
271<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
272<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
273<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
274<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
275<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
276<br />
(Aviel VERBRUGGEN, University of Antwerp)<br />
2 A 4 4 4 5 This para repeats practice (see <strong>co</strong>mments on para 1) of singling out<br />
only the per capita emission factor for attention of policy makers.<br />
In terms of a policy relevant report, there is no foundation for<br />
narrowing the focus in this way. In the same way proposed for the<br />
treatment of recent historic trends <strong>co</strong>vered in para 1, the discussion<br />
of future trends in para 2 should deal with all the relevant macro<br />
factors dealt with in para 1.<br />
(Government of Australia)<br />
2 A 4 4 4 5 “……. will remain substantially higher...” – A range <strong>co</strong>uld be given<br />
by what magnitude, to highlight the large inequities.<br />
(Government of India)<br />
3 A 4 8 0 0 We propose that the acronym "SRES" is explained may be in a<br />
footnote - possibly also with some explanation regarding the use of<br />
these scenarios in the rest of the <strong>SPM</strong>.<br />
(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)<br />
2 A 4 5 4 5 Paragraph notes that two thirds of increase in emissions to 2030<br />
will <strong>co</strong>me from developing <strong>co</strong>untries, but notes per capita<br />
emissions in developed <strong>co</strong>untries will remain higher – should add a<br />
breakdown of percentage of total global emissions from developed<br />
and developing <strong>co</strong>untries, not just per capita figures.<br />
(Government of Australia)<br />
2 A 4 5 4 5 Insert ", than in Developing Countries" to make the meaning of the<br />
last phrase of the sentence clearer.<br />
(Government of Australia)<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-46 2 B 4 5 4 5 The <strong>co</strong>ncerns should be about the growth of emissions globally, not<br />
about whether some <strong>co</strong>untry or region has more or less emissions<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
See A-267 See <strong>SPM</strong>-267<br />
(1)<br />
ACC; add E/GDP sentence 1 ACC: will be<br />
(with additional graph)<br />
dealt with in<br />
Chapter 1 and<br />
then Chairs can<br />
decide if in<br />
<strong>SPM</strong><br />
(1)<br />
See A-267 See <strong>SPM</strong>-267<br />
(1)<br />
ACC; glossary Glos ACC: glossary<br />
(1)<br />
Write SRES in<br />
DISCUSS; can this be shown in<br />
simple manner in graph?<br />
Otherwise leave to TS/chapter<br />
(1)<br />
full<br />
1 See <strong>SPM</strong>-267<br />
(1)<br />
ACC Acc<br />
(1)<br />
REJ; distributional info is very<br />
relevant for policy makers<br />
Agree with TSU<br />
(1)<br />
Page 68 of 348