SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
SPM-
838
SPM-
839
SPM-
840
SPM-
841
SPM-
842
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
13 A 12 7 12 9 Does this statement border on policy prescriptive? U.S.
Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
13 A 12 8 0 0 Why feed-in tariffs "in particular"? This may be a major policy tool
in European countries, but portfolio standards are common in the
US, and environmentally-motivated tariffs are not that common in
develping countries. Delete ", in particular," which also suggests
preference for a particular policy tool.
(Harald Winkler, University of Cape Town)
0 A 12 9 0 0 Add a new Paragraph between 13 and 14: “The scenario described
in Table SPM 2 provides a maximum of 50 EJ/year of new non-
CO2-emitting power, beyond the baseline case, in 2030. It will be
necessary to provide non-CO2-emitting primary power in the range
of 150 EJ/year by 2050, 500 EJ/year by 2100 and over 1000
EJ/year during the next century, while limiting CO2-emitting power
to a small fraction of this level. The total requirement over the
period until 2200 is in the range of 100,000 EJ. To address this
problem requires R&D to provide large-scale non-CO2-emitting
energy resources that, in aggregate, are not limited in their
fractional market penetration. Table SPM 3 provides a perspective
on the options to provide these levels of energy. “ [Copy corrected
version of Table 4.3.1 here as SPM 3.]
(Robert Goldston, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
13 A 12 9 0 0 Suggest to drop "in particular" before "feed-in tarrifs". What policy
works best depends on the situation of a specific country.
(Koji Kadono, Global Industrial and Social Progress Research
Institute(GISPRI))
13 A 12 9 12 0 Suggest adding new # paragraph to specifically address long term
energy supply. “#. The challenge for the latter part of the century
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
doubt that)
REJ; statement based on the
literature
REJ; literature shows feed-in
tariffs are very effective
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
No. We are
listing possible
alternatives
quoted in
literature.
(4)
REJ; literature
shows feed-in
tariffs are very
effective
(4)
REJ; text is incomprehensible Rejected. Too
much details for
SPM.
(4)
See A-839 Rejected. WG
III is reporting
literature
evidences.
REJ; this is covered in para 14
and section B para 6
(4)
Noted. Longterm
options
Page 221 of 348