30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

new power technologies that can almost <strong>co</strong>mpletely replace carbonemitting<br />

technologies during the <strong>co</strong>urse of this century. Essentially,<br />

these technologies are carbon capture and storage, solar (substituted<br />

by other renewables where locally appropriate), fusion and<br />

advanced nuclear fission. This point is not made with real clarity in<br />

the <strong>SPM</strong>: it is diffused and hidden by the detail.<br />

(Ian Cook, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-7 0 A 0 0 0 0 In General, "Summary for Policy Makers" doesn't mach the<br />

opinions in the original report very well, some statements in<br />

"Summary for Policy Makers" can not get supports from relevant<br />

chapters.<br />

(Yuan Guo, Energy Research Institute, National Development and<br />

Reform Commission)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-8 0 A 0 0 0 0 Poorly written and full of references, citations and figures.<br />

Cumbersome and difficult to read. Unlikely that reading this will be<br />

helpful to policy makers.<br />

(David Jackson, McMaster University)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-9 30 A 0 0 0 0 Overall I find that this section underplays the role of technology<br />

research and development and in particular the very positive role<br />

that international <strong>co</strong>poperation plays in this area.<br />

(David Jackson, McMaster University)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-10 27 A 0 0 0 0 Particularly the example of petrol taxes ought to be mentioned<br />

more. This is the only truly large scale implementation of carbon<br />

pricing (in practice - even though that terminology was not used)<br />

before Kyoto. The fact that taxes only have effect in the long run<br />

and that the political e<strong>co</strong>nomy of taxes is tricky makes it all the<br />

more important to act immediately. See Hammar, H., Å. Löfgrem<br />

and T. Sterner, (2004), ‘Political E<strong>co</strong>nomy Obstacles to Fuel<br />

Taxation’, Energy Journal, ISSN0195-6574, Vol. 25(3), pp 1-17.<br />

(Thomas Sterner, Univ of Göteborg)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-11 0 A 0 0 0 0 Not enough emphasis overall on the overarching importance of<br />

creating a strong price signal on carbon emissions<br />

(Thomas Sterner, Univ of Göteborg)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-12 0 A 0 0 0 0 Need an overview of climate impact. Especially what it means to<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

UNCLEAR, which ones?<br />

See A6<br />

TIA, in <strong>co</strong>nsidering <strong>co</strong>mments<br />

on para 30 and table 3<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

13<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

DISCUSS 13 Doesn’t belong<br />

in <strong>SPM</strong>. See ch<br />

13.<br />

REJ, see para 26<br />

Page 4 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!