SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
para<br />
1030 he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1031<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1032<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1033<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
1034<br />
g<br />
26<br />
he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
26<br />
he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
26<br />
he<br />
ad<br />
in<br />
g<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
create additional incentives,” but am not overall <strong>co</strong>nvinced how<br />
meaningful this statement is. Just seems like pointing out the<br />
obvious. U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
A 14 30 14 30 "…..incentives for business and <strong>co</strong>nsumers……". The term<br />
“business” may be replaced by “producers” since all producers (e.g.<br />
subsistence farmers, village <strong>co</strong>operatives) are not businesses.<br />
(Government of India)<br />
A 14 31 14 31 Add: 'Additional incentives related to direct government funding<br />
and regulations are also important, particularly in relation to<br />
innovation where market signals are insufficient.' This very<br />
important point, which does appear in the section below, needs to<br />
be highlighted. Market signals, dependent on regulations and/or<br />
financial incentives such as permit trading, are not sufficient to<br />
motivate the development of innovation beyond the short-term,<br />
because of the inhibiting effects of uncertainties over the<br />
persistence of government policies.<br />
(Ian Cook, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority)<br />
A 14 31 14 0 Change “deliver the identified potentials” to “realize potential<br />
emissions reductions.” Rationale: The assessment should not<br />
imply that emissions reductions are an “all or nothing choice” with<br />
a decision to be made between achieving “the” potential or doing<br />
nothing. U.S. Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
26 A 14 32 14 33 Rephrasing is needed. The sentense should be "there are large<br />
potential at low <strong>co</strong>sts". All the studies in the report suggests that<br />
there are large potential at low <strong>co</strong>sts but ch 4-10 suggest that there<br />
is a wide range of policy instruments available as we see in the pp<br />
15 l1-5.. The term "carbon pricing" implies emission trading<br />
systems or carbon tax to most policy makers. However, either of<br />
them are not the essential policy instruments in many cases in ch 4-<br />
10. Care is needed that what "carbon pricing " means are different<br />
for ch 3& 11 (modeller's chapter) authors and policy makers.<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
See A-1027<br />
ACC<br />
See A-1027<br />
REJ; this point is made<br />
sufficiently in section D<br />
See A-1027<br />
ACC; change “deliver” into<br />
“realise”<br />
See A-1024<br />
TIA when reformulating, to<br />
avoid misunderstanding that<br />
only through pricing<br />
instruments a price can be<br />
created; for some sectors nonpricing<br />
instruments are much<br />
more important (regulation in<br />
particular)<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
Page 279 of 348