30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

629 dis<strong>co</strong>unting rates in (socio-)e<strong>co</strong>nomic models for climate change.<br />

Model and CBA out<strong>co</strong>mes are very sensitive to dis<strong>co</strong>unting rates,<br />

and this lack in progress hampers decision making on the<br />

magnitude of mitigation and adaptation efforts. We therefore<br />

suggest to add: "As the choice of dis<strong>co</strong>unt rates largely remains a<br />

value judgement, the use of different dis<strong>co</strong>unt rates in model<br />

calculations and CBAs may assist transparant decision making."<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

630<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

631<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

632<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

633<br />

(Government of The Netherlands)<br />

8 A 8 21 8 21 Add: "It is, however, very important to put estimates of mitigation<br />

<strong>co</strong>sts into <strong>co</strong>ntext by relating them to quantitative assessments of<br />

damages avoided by mitigation on different time scales. Qualitative<br />

evidence in the WG II report of AR4 suggests, that benefits from<br />

avoided damages are likely to be enormous. Nevertheless,<br />

quantitative assessments of aggregate benefits are poorly reflected<br />

in WG II and WG III reports of AR4. Strengthening such<br />

information in future IPCC assessments would be highly desirable."<br />

(Government of Germany)<br />

7 A 8 22 0 0 Footnote 4: The welfare implications of mitigation are hugely<br />

influenced by "should pay for mitigation". Include a sentence along<br />

the lines of 'Bottom-up studies that <strong>co</strong>nsider the distribution of<br />

payment for mitigation may <strong>co</strong>me to very different <strong>co</strong>nclusions.'<br />

(Harald Winkler, University of Cape Town)<br />

7 A 8 22 0 0 Footnote 4: please add at the end "... should pay for this mitigation<br />

and do not quantify the benefits from mitigation"<br />

(Manfred Treber, Germanwatch)<br />

0 A 8 22 9 1 Add a paragraph in order to discuss the effect of a noticeable and<br />

sustained increase of oil and gas prices in the period (as already<br />

observed) on emissions scenarios. While approaching the "peak oil"<br />

(between now and year 2030), one <strong>co</strong>uld expect much higher oil<br />

and gas prices. Although ups and down may still occur, this should<br />

be <strong>co</strong>nsidered as a real opportunity for policy makers,w ho should<br />

<strong>co</strong>nsider it is of good policy to maintain sustained high prices for<br />

the <strong>co</strong>nsumers in order to help the shift for better energy<br />

management and renewable sources.<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

See A-612<br />

REJ; that is already said in line<br />

11-12<br />

See A-612<br />

See high oil price para issue A-<br />

256<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

Page 163 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!