SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter-<br />
Comment<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
755<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
186<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
756<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
757<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
758<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
759<br />
<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />
187<br />
para<br />
Batch<br />
From Page<br />
From Line<br />
To Page<br />
To line<br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />
2030. A peer-reviewed source for this figure can be found in: den<br />
Elzen, M. and Meinshausen, M. 2006, “Multi-Gas Emission<br />
Pathways for Meeting the EU 2 C Climate Target”, In: Hans<br />
Joachim Schellnhuber (editor in chief) Avoiding Dangerous<br />
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press 299-309; figure 31.8,<br />
page 308<br />
(Government of Germany)<br />
10 A 11 19 11 26 Are there estimates regarding the GDP loss to be expected to meet<br />
the EU target of a maximum of 2 C?<br />
(Government of Germany)<br />
10 B 11 19 11 19 How do these <strong>co</strong>st estimated relate to those shown in paragraph 7<br />
(page 8)?<br />
(Government of European Community / European Commission)<br />
10 A 11 20 11 27 This paragraph should provide <strong>co</strong>sts estimates also for more<br />
aggressive mitigation scenarios, <strong>co</strong>nsistent with trajectories towards<br />
400 ppm and below.<br />
(,)<br />
10 A 11 20 11 20 Again, this paragraph seems to re<strong>co</strong>mmend a stabilization level<br />
around 650 ppmv CO2 emissions, while the literature on<br />
stablization of GHG <strong>co</strong>ncentrations indicate to levels as low as 375<br />
ppmv CO2. The text should therefore mention <strong>co</strong>st estimates for<br />
mitigation <strong>co</strong>nsitent with 375 ppmv<br />
(Giulio Volpi, WWF International)<br />
10 A 11 21 11 22 Please specify when stabilisation would occur.<br />
(Government of Australia)<br />
10 A 11 21 11 22 The figures of 0.5% and 1% GDP loss need some <strong>co</strong>ntext. Provide<br />
an estimate of the actual loss in dollars in 2030. Also, why is this<br />
for 2030 when similar data on p. 8, lines 4-6 are for 2050? U.S.<br />
Government<br />
(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />
10 B 11 21 11 22 The figures of 0.5% and 1% GDP loss need some <strong>co</strong>ntext. Provide<br />
an estimate of the actual loss in dollars in 2030. Also, why is this<br />
for 2030 when similar data on p. 8, lines 4-6 are for 2050? U.S.<br />
Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />
Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />
REJ; this can be derived from<br />
table 2 and para 10, but there is<br />
no reason to single that out in<br />
text<br />
Action<br />
for<br />
chapter<br />
Considerations<br />
by the writing<br />
team<br />
REJ.<br />
(11)<br />
See A-748,752 See 748<br />
(11)<br />
See A-749 See 744<br />
(11)<br />
See A-747 See A-747<br />
(11)<br />
ACC; refer to table 1 ACC.<br />
(11)<br />
See A-751<br />
REJ. Also drop<br />
Section C is ST, section B is LT<br />
footnote.<br />
(11)<br />
Identical A-759 REJ. Also drop<br />
footnote.<br />
(11)<br />
Page 199 of 348
Change language