SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
513 (Cédric PHILIBERT, International Energy Agency) Carbon intensity
improvements is
occurring but at
low rate. We
need a faster
improvement
over time.
SPM-
514
SPM-
515
SPM-
104
SPM-
516
SPM-
517
6 A 7 18 7 18 replace "carbon intensity improvements need to be much higher" by
"carbon intensity reductions need to be much bigger"
(Aviel VERBRUGGEN, University of Antwerp)
6 A 7 18 7 18 Do you mean that C intensity improvements need to have a lower
endpoint than historically, or do you mean that the rate of C
intensity reduction over time needs to be greater than historically?
(Rachel Warren, University of East Anglia)
6 B 7 18 7 18 … much higher: you probably mean "much faster"?
(Jean-Pascal van YPERSELE, Université catholique de Louvain
(Belgium))
6 A 7 19 7 19 replace "(both non-CO2 and CO2)" by "(targeting CO2 and non-
CO2 GHG)"
(Aviel VERBRUGGEN, University of Antwerp)
6 A 7 19 7 19 Add to "forestry mitigation options" "and avoided deforestation"
(Rachel Warren, University of East Anglia)
Prefer A-513 Rejected.
Carbon intensity
improvements is
occurring but at
low rate. We
need a faster
improvement
over time.
The latter, see A-513 Rejected.
Carbon intensity
improvements is
occurring but at
low rate. We
need a faster
improvement
over time.
ACC See comment
SPM 513A.
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
ACC Accepted.
(4)
REJ; that is already included in
forestry mitigation
Rejected. That
is already
Page 132 of 348