SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SPM-
1311
SPM-
1312
SPM-
1313
SPM-
1314
SPM-
265
SPM-
1315
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
options have been taken, energy efficiency does not offer any
further options. In other words, the relevance of energy efficiency
options would appear to be very strongly dependent on regional and
national circumstances and pre-existing policies. Also, please
provide explicit reference to relevant underlying chapter sections in
square brackets after this bullet (and separately after the next).
(Andy Reisinger, TSU IPCC Synthesis Report)
32 A 19 31 19 31 Insert 'and saving' options are almost always cost effective.
(Government of Spain)
32 A 19 31 0 36 We propose that regional (air) pollution is also included in the
additional benefits.
(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)
32 A 19 31 19 32 It is said that energy efficiency options are almost cost effective.
This depends on which technology we are talking about and the
cost. The fact that these options are not already implemented can
sometimes be explained by hidden costs.
(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)
32 A 19 31 19 0 Rewrite the first sentence of the bullet starting on this line with the
following, for greater accuracy: “MANY energy efficiency options
are cost effective, AND WILL improve energy security and reduce
local pollutant emissions. HOWEVER, OPPORTUNITY COSTS
MUST BE CONSIDERED”. [Note: Inserts are shown in UPPER
CASE; deletions are not shown.] U.S. Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
32 B 19 31 0 0 Rewrite the first sentence of the bullet starting on this line with the
following, for greater accuracy: “MANY energy efficiency options
are cost effective, AND WILL improve energy security and reduce
local pollutant emissions. HOWEVER, OPPORTUNITY COSTS
MUST BE CONSIDERED”. [Note: Inserts are shown in UPPER
CASE; deletions are not shown.] U.S. Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
32 A 19 32 19 36 Energy security goals are sometimes in conflict with GHG
emissions reductions goals. U.S. Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
(12)
REJ; no need Not Ch8 issue
(8)
Rejected
(12)
REJ; is covered already Not Ch8 issue
(8)
Rejected
(12)
See A-1309 Not Ch8 issue
(8)
Accepted
(12)
Prefer A-1309 Not Ch8 issue
(8)
Accepted
(12)
Identical A-1314 Accepted
(12)
ACC; add wording to show
trade-offs
Not Ch8 issue
(8)
Accepted. Will
be taken into
account
Page 341 of 348