SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
SPM-
1212
SPM-
1213
SPM-
1214
SPM-
1215
SPM-
1216
para
30
T
3
30
T
3
30
T
3
30
T
3
30
T
3
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
Ueno, T., Sugiyama, T., 2006. International Cooperation in
Technology Development and Diffusion: Case Analysis and
Discussion on Future Climate Regime, Research Report
No.Y05005, the Central Research Institute of Electric Power
Industry, Japan (ISBN: 4-86216-173-1) (written in Japanese).
(Taishi Sugiyama, CRIEPI)
A 17 1 17 1 In figure SPM.3, suggest that the columns with +, -, and ? be
removed. The source of these judgements is not clear and does not
appear justified. For example under environmental effectiveness,
each are said that they can be effective but some are given +, some
? and some -?
(Haroon Kheshgi, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Company)
A 17 1 17 1 In figure SPM.3, a key inefficiency (barrier to investment) with cap
and trade is the lack of credible long-term allocation and the
uncertainty related to non-compliance. Suggest adding this to cost
effectiveness box.
(Haroon Kheshgi, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Company)
A 17 1 17 1 In figure SPM.3 suggest adding under institutions for the targets
row, “mechanisms to generate national allocations”.
(Haroon Kheshgi, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Company)
A 17 1 17 1 In figure SPM.3 sectoral agreements are not necessarily global, yet
the explanation makes it appear so. Suggest reconsidering.
(Haroon Kheshgi, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Company)
A 17 1 0 0 Table SPM.3, erratum: row sectoral agreements: comes out to
negative, examples as ACEA agreement with car-manufacturs
seems to suggest a more positive judgement, EU trading is a kind of
sectoral agreement, due to the fact that only a limited nr of
companies are participating, bench marking as part of trading
(allocation discussion) can also be seen in the light of sectoral
agreement. Third column distribution/equity issue cell seems the
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
See A-1200
See A-1200
See A-1200
See A-1200
See A-1200
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
Page 320 of 348