30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

547<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

548<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

549<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

550<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

551<br />

para<br />

6<br />

F<br />

4<br />

6<br />

F<br />

4<br />

6<br />

F<br />

4<br />

6<br />

F<br />

4<br />

6<br />

F<br />

4<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

A 7 25 8 1 figure <strong>SPM</strong>.4 title: replace first 3 lines by "Emission reductions<br />

cumulative over 2000-2100 for alternative mitigation measures,<br />

assessed by the models IMAGE (upper bars) and MESSAGE<br />

(lower bars). Black ...etc.<br />

(Aviel VERBRUGGEN, University of Antwerp)<br />

A 7 25 7 25 Fig SMP.4 Achieving a lower forcing function would require more<br />

investment in low carbon technologies but it is not clear from the<br />

figure or discussion how the respective carbon savings from each<br />

technology <strong>co</strong>mpare with what is happening today; or what<br />

investment is needed in each technology to achieve these savings. It<br />

would be helpful to policy makers to put this in the wider <strong>co</strong>ntext<br />

so they have an idea of the scale of the challenge and hence the<br />

need for some quite strong policy instruments to create investment<br />

critical mass.<br />

(Government of UK)<br />

A 7 25 7 25 Figure <strong>SPM</strong>.4: Change "Biofuels(incl.CCS)" to "Biofuels".<br />

Reason:Biofuels should be one part of renewalbe energy. And it is<br />

not necessary to emphsize CCS here.<br />

(Government of China Meteorological Administration)<br />

A 7 25 0 0 Fig. <strong>SPM</strong> 4 We propose that ppmv CO2-eq is used as the primary<br />

unit when reference is made to stabilisation. The figure and text<br />

should, if feasible, be rewritten to reflect this. Furtehrmore, we<br />

propose to use "bioenergy" in stead of "biofuel" (fuel will often be<br />

taken as liquid fuel) and "redusctions in other emissions than CO2"<br />

instead of "Non-CO2".<br />

(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)<br />

A 7 25 7 25 Fig <strong>SPM</strong>-4: The w/m2 will not be clear to most people. The point<br />

that reductions required to go to lower stabilization levels (i.e. from<br />

650 to 500ppm (grey bars)) will be significant, and that the role of<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

it should be<br />

mentioned that<br />

there is choice,<br />

but at a price<br />

ACC Accepted, but<br />

figure will be<br />

changed.<br />

(4)<br />

DICUSS if investment data can<br />

be given<br />

(4)<br />

3, 11,4 noted. However<br />

data unavailable<br />

(ch3)<br />

Accepted. Try<br />

to include<br />

investment.<br />

(4)<br />

ACC, see A-537 See <strong>co</strong>mment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong> 537 A.<br />

(4)<br />

ACC drop W/m2 and use<br />

bioenergy<br />

Accepted. Drop<br />

W/m2 and use<br />

bioenergy<br />

(4)<br />

ACC, see A-550 See <strong>SPM</strong><br />

<strong>co</strong>mment 550 A<br />

(4)<br />

Page 141 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!