30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

<strong>co</strong>ncerns and offer a re<strong>co</strong>mmendation on an appropriate <strong>co</strong>mparison<br />

of the bottom-up estimates from Chapters 4 to 10 and the top-down<br />

estimates from integrated models in Chapters 3 and 11. U.S.<br />

Government<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-7 B 0 0 0 0 Because bioenergy is treated partially in so many chapters<br />

(renewables, transport, and industry) there is no integrated or<br />

detailed discussion of its potential. More cross-referencing is<br />

needed and there should be a fuller discussion of the biorefinery<br />

<strong>co</strong>ncept in one of the chapters—perhaps transport since biofuels are<br />

perhaps the most important of its multiple products. U.S.<br />

Government<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-8 6 B 0 0 0 0 Advanced technology should play a much more central role in the<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>. Material should be brought forward from Chapter 2 into the<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>. Suggested insertions to the <strong>SPM</strong> can <strong>co</strong>me from:<br />

-Chapter 1, p. 17, paragraph beginning w/line 33: the key <strong>co</strong>ncepts<br />

this para should be better <strong>co</strong>vered.<br />

-Chapter 1, p. 20, line 46: Generally speaking, it would be<br />

e<strong>co</strong>nomically impossible, without technology research,<br />

development, demonstration, deployment and diffusion<br />

(RDDD&D) and Induced Technology Change (ITC) to stabilize<br />

GHG <strong>co</strong>ncentration at a level that would prevent DAI with the<br />

climate system.<br />

-Chapter 2, p. 65, Figure 2.2: The point that distribution “optimal”<br />

(<strong>co</strong>st-minimizing) emission scenarios is bimodal, illustrating that<br />

technological lock-in into either high or low emissions futures<br />

respectively that arise from technological interdependence and<br />

spillover effects.<br />

-Chapter 2, p. 69, lines 11-16: “Differences in the <strong>co</strong>st of meeting a<br />

prescribed CO2 <strong>co</strong>ncentration target across alternative technology<br />

development pathways that <strong>co</strong>uld unfold in the absence of climate<br />

policies are more important than <strong>co</strong>st differences between<br />

alternative stabilization levels within a given technology-reference<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

See A-1 CG<br />

biomass<br />

TIA in <strong>co</strong>nsidering para 6, but<br />

space limited<br />

� include<br />

� include<br />

� to be <strong>co</strong>nsidered in<br />

para 6.<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

3 issue not for<br />

ch3.<br />

(3)<br />

Page 26 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!