SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

Chapter-
Comment
SPM-
1020
SPM-
1021
SPM-
1022
SPM-
1023
SPM-
233
SPM-
234
SPM-
1024
para
Batch
From Page
From Line
To Page
To line
Comments
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
climate, it must have at least the potential for globally relevant (ie
significant/major/large-scale/pervasive, etc) side-effects.
(Andy Reisinger, TSU IPCC Synthesis Report)
27 A 15 25 15 25 The description of the Japanese Cool Biz campaign is a strong case
study which deals with mitigation and adaptation. The Cool Biz
campaign has shown remarkable performance in its implementation
expense versus CO2 reduction effectiveness ratio. Due to this
effectiveness, it is suggested that a description of the Cool Biz
campaign be given in the SPM as an example for policy makers as
a low-cost, highly effective, co-beneficial adaptation, mitigation
policy strategy.
(Government of Japan)
25 A 14 25 14 27 The text "by bringing material into the upper atmosphere" is vague
- propose to delete it due to the unclear meaning as well as being
very "speculative"
(Government of Finland)
25 A 14 25 14 27 Want to define “ocean fertilization” for policy makers? U.S.
Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
25 A 14 25 14 27 Strike reference to “uncosted”. Costs have been estimated in the
literature. U.S. Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
25 B 14 25 14 25 Thank you for including this para.
(Jean-Pascal van YPERSELE, Université catholique de Louvain
(Belgium))
25 B 14 25 14 27 Delete this paragraph because it does not provide useful
information ("…remain largely speculative").
(Government of Switzerland)
26 A 14 33 14 33 The statement in the headline statement is either incorrect or
misleading, and should be deleted. A number of options exist to
provide policy incentives equivalent to carbon pricing. The second
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
Response suggested by cochairs
REJ; no space for case studies
in SPM
REJ; keep it
ACC; glossary
DISCUSS; if ch 11 has good
cost assessment than add to
SPM
Thank you
REJ; others want it and it is in
the report
ACC; delete first sentence and
replace by second
Action
for
chapter
Considerations
by the writing
team
11 Ch 11 need to
find out from
US, which
literature they
refer too. Else:
“largely
Page 277 of 348