30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

(Government of Switzerland) 531<br />

(4)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- 6 B 7 22 7 23 What does a strong government role mean/imply? U.S.<br />

Identical A-531 See <strong>SPM</strong> 531A<br />

108<br />

Government<br />

(Government of U.S. Department of State)<br />

(4)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- 6 A 7 23 0 0 Figure <strong>SPM</strong>-4 (TS-16) raises two questions to me: the relatively See A-527 Accepted.<br />

532 F<br />

low <strong>co</strong>ntribution of <strong>co</strong>nservation and efficiency in MESSAGE (5th<br />

Figure will<br />

4<br />

largest <strong>co</strong>ntribution) <strong>co</strong>mpared to IMAGE (1st largest<br />

include more<br />

<strong>co</strong>ntribution), and the apparent large difference in total required<br />

models..<br />

reductions between MESSAGE and IMAGE. I suggest to address<br />

these questions at least in the TS.<br />

(Rob Swart, MNP)<br />

(4)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- A 7 23 7 24 what is the meaning of this statement?<br />

See A-530,531 See A-530,531<br />

533<br />

(Aviel VERBRUGGEN, University of Antwerp)<br />

(4)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- 6 A 7 24 7 24 In Figure <strong>SPM</strong>.4 suggest changing “Biofuels” to “Bioenergy” ACC Accepted.<br />

534 F<br />

which is more inclusive. Many would interpret biofuels to mean<br />

(4)<br />

4<br />

transportation fuels whereas much of the potential is for electricity<br />

from biomass.<br />

(Haroon Kheshgi, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering<br />

Company)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- 6 A 7 24 7 25 Reword: A strong government role in management of long-term See A-530, 531 See A-530, 531<br />

535 F<br />

technology transitions is important,<br />

(4)<br />

4<br />

though approaches may differ.<br />

(Government of UK)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- 6 A 7 24 7 24 It is unclear to what the "Non-CO2" category in Figure <strong>SPM</strong>.4 ACC; add in caption Accepted. Add<br />

536 F<br />

refers. Please provide a more <strong>co</strong>mplete label.<br />

in caption.<br />

4<br />

(Government of Environment Canada)<br />

(4)<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>- 6 B 7 24 7 27 Consider moving text beginning at Line 25 to the top of Figure Identical B-110 See <strong>SPM</strong> 110B<br />

109 F<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>.4 or giving it a title.<br />

(4)<br />

4<br />

Is this the first use in the document of “W/m2” ? If so, for lay<br />

reader may wish to footnote or explain briefly as a measure of<br />

radiative forcing. Ditto the term “radiative forcing”.<br />

Clarify or explain “SRES B2” when first used. U.S. Government<br />

Page 137 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!