30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

997<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

998<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

999<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

23 A 14 9 14 9 It is proposed to substitute "the literature" by "some literature" in<br />

order to be more <strong>co</strong>nsistent with the limited evidence as indicated<br />

by footnote 13.<br />

(Government of Austria)<br />

23 A 14 9 14 11 “literature indicates that supply from agriculture and forestry,<br />

without <strong>co</strong>mpromising food security at global scale, is not a<br />

limiting factor” References (literature) discussed in some other<br />

chapter?<br />

(Government of Finland)<br />

23 A 14 10 14 12 "Supply from agriculture and forestry, without <strong>co</strong>mpromising food<br />

security at global scale, is not a limiting factor." The statement is<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

See A-982<br />

REJ; it is representative of the<br />

literature<br />

See A-982<br />

Is in ch4<br />

See A-982<br />

DISCUSS<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

Accepted. I<br />

think this is a<br />

fair statement.<br />

We should<br />

revise this<br />

paragraph –<br />

topic for the<br />

bioenergy<br />

breakout group<br />

discussion in<br />

NZ?<br />

(8)<br />

Noted. Check if<br />

we have to<br />

restrain the<br />

word<br />

“literature”.<br />

(4)<br />

Accepted. I<br />

think this is a<br />

fair statement.<br />

We should<br />

revise this<br />

paragraph –<br />

topic for the<br />

bioenergy<br />

breakout group<br />

discussion in<br />

NZ?<br />

See <strong>co</strong>mment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong> 982 A.<br />

(4)<br />

Accepted. I<br />

think this is a<br />

Page 269 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!