30.01.2013 Views

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-<br />

Comment<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

110<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

111<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

112<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

113<br />

<strong>SPM</strong>-<br />

114<br />

para<br />

Batch<br />

From Page<br />

From Line<br />

To Page<br />

To line<br />

<strong>Comments</strong><br />

IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Se<strong>co</strong>nd Order Draft<br />

e<strong>co</strong>nomy. This is a different impression from the statement on<br />

page 1 that "C intensity did not change much" - I would that it did<br />

in the 1970s but not since. Suggest edit line 11 to 12 to read<br />

"...GDP. Whilst the C intensity of energy declined in the 1970s, it<br />

has <strong>co</strong>ntributed little towards limiting CO2 emissions in the last 2<br />

decades".<br />

(Rachel Warren, University of East Anglia)<br />

1 A 1 5 2 11 Figure 1 states that uncertainty for CO2 from deforestation, CH4<br />

and N20 from agriculture, and fluorinated gases have the highest<br />

uncertainty, but doesn't quantify it at all - some order-of-magnitude<br />

quantification would be very helpful here.<br />

(Paul Baer, E<strong>co</strong>Equity)<br />

1 A 1 5 1 15 It would be useful to quantify global current GHG emissions in<br />

absolute terms, as reported in Figure <strong>SPM</strong>1<br />

(Government of UK)<br />

1 A 1 5 1 15 Add a note clarifying what the Montreal Proto<strong>co</strong>l gases are.<br />

(Government of UK)<br />

1 A 1 6 1 7 Change "without additional policies ---" to "without additional<br />

climate and technology policies ---". It is unclear here whether<br />

"policy" means simply climate polices or it includes technology<br />

policies (especially basic R&D policies). It is certain that<br />

introduction of climate policies alone can not stabilize/reduce<br />

global GHG emissions (This is clearly stated in Technical<br />

Summary p. 18, lines 30-33). Therefore to make it clear, a word<br />

"technology" should be inserted.<br />

(Mitsutsune Yamaguchi, Teikyo University)<br />

1 A 1 6 0 0 "without additional policies" are better changed to "without<br />

additional climate policies and technological innovation". The<br />

necessity of technological innovation is described, for example, in<br />

para 6.<br />

Expert Review of Se<strong>co</strong>nd-Order-Draft<br />

Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote<br />

Response suggested by <strong>co</strong><strong>chair</strong>s<br />

REJ; quantification of<br />

uncertainty to be left to chapter<br />

Action<br />

for<br />

chapter<br />

Considerations<br />

by the writing<br />

team<br />

informative<br />

especially if<br />

projected trends<br />

are added.<br />

Text/caption<br />

will be<br />

improved<br />

(CH1)<br />

1 Partially<br />

accepted –<br />

uncertainty<br />

associated with<br />

deforestation<br />

will be dealt<br />

with (Bill)<br />

REJ; has no added value Agreed with<br />

TSU<br />

(1)<br />

ACC; add in brackets Accepted –<br />

Rej; it is all policies AGREED<br />

WITH TSU<br />

(1)<br />

See A 112 Agreed with<br />

TSU<br />

(1)<br />

(1)<br />

(1)<br />

Page 34 of 348

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!