SODBatch A&B SPM Comments co-chair response final ... - ipcc-wg3

SPM-
1269
SPM-
1270
SPM-
1271
SPM-
1272
SPM-
1273
SPM-
1274
IPCC WGIII Fourth Assessment Report, Second Order Draft
31 A 18 20 18 24 If confusion is to be avoided, Bullet 2 in point 31 and its associated
chart (SPM.7) should be deleted, The chart is too selective in the
drivers it identifies and certainly does not adequately identify the
way they may (or may not) interact, re-inforce or contradict either
themselves, or other aspects of sustainable development. Much
more seriously, evaluation of low mitigation potential for decisions
on rural energy development (based on potential for current
emissions, not future emissions) is inconsistent with mtigation
potential assessed for the other drivers (which are assumed to be
future) and, most seriously of all, sends the wrong message to
policymakers
(Pat Finnegan, Grian)
31 A 18 20 18 24 Please supply references to relevant underlying chapter sections in
square brackets after this bullet.
(Andy Reisinger, TSU IPCC Synthesis Report)
31 A 18 21 18 21 To add:¨....energy security, selection of sectors where will be
realized investments, forest conservation....¨
(CRISTOBAL FELIX DIAZ MOREJON, MINISTRY OF
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT)
31 A 18 21 0 0 We propose that "liberalization" is replaced by "policy" (in addition
"liberalization or subsidies" might be added in brackets).
(Government of Norwegian Pollution Control Authority)
31 A 18 21 18 23 Why does forest conservation “seem unrelated to climate policy?”
SPM talks about agriculture and forestry. U.S. Government
(Government of U.S. Department of State)
31
F
7
A 18 22 18 22 Fig SPM.7 is difficult to understand because phrase 'associated
emissions' is not explained. Does it relate to current emissions
levels or some point in future? Phrase 'profound impacts' also
seems overstated when 'associated emissions' uses unit of Mt CO2
Expert Review of Second-Order-Draft
Confidential, Do Not Cite or Quote
See A-1268
Text to be retained
See ch 12
proposal
ACCEPTED,
text retained and
explains.
(Ch 12)
ACC ACCEPTED,
[12.2.2.2,
12.2.3.3]
(Ch 12)
REJ; unclear REJECTED,
unclear
(Ch 12)
ACC TIA, will
change to
‘electricity
market
REFORM’
REJ; because there are many
good reasons other than climate
change to do so
(Ch 12)
REJECTED,
text says ‘may’
seem unrelated
and there are
good reasons
other than
climate change
to do so
(Ch 12)
See A-1268 ACCEPTED,
Fig 12.7 will be
removed and
replaced by
Page 332 of 348