01.03.2013 Views

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148<br />

• <strong>The</strong> HAR in the LMPC is moderate across the board.<br />

<strong>The</strong> hinterland access regime in the LMPC<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> most important inland mode in the LMPC is inland waterways. Mainly dry bulk is<br />

transported over the vast Mississippi river network. Oil is processed to a large extent ‘on<br />

site’ or transported by pipeline. <strong>The</strong> inland shipping system for bulk is very efficient. <strong>The</strong><br />

widespread use <strong>of</strong> push-barges allows for economies <strong>of</strong> scale and better equipment<br />

utilization, while standardization secures efficient cargo handling. This system has already<br />

been ‘running’ for decades, so that improvements are incremental 87 . Table 59 shows the<br />

various initiatives/investments to improve the hinterland access regime in the LMPC.<br />

Table 59: Initiatives/investments to improve the hinterland access regime in the LMPC<br />

Mode <strong>of</strong><br />

coordination<br />

Relevant initiatives/investments<br />

Hierarchies No single firm has made major investments that have improved the hinterland<br />

accessibility.<br />

Interfirm alliances <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> strategic alliances to improve the hinterland accessibility is very limited.<br />

Associations <strong>The</strong> barge fleeting association, the freight forwarders association and the steamship<br />

association promote the interests <strong>of</strong> their members. <strong>The</strong>y are not actively lobbying for<br />

more infrastructure or a better interface with the terminals.<br />

Public-private<br />

partnerships<br />

Public<br />

organizations<br />

Public-private partnerships do not play a role in the HAR in the LMPC .<br />

<strong>The</strong> Public Belt Railroad is the most important public organization in the hinterland<br />

access regime. <strong>The</strong> port authorities are hardly involved. <strong>The</strong> port <strong>of</strong> New Orleans has a<br />

(strategic) partnership with the inland port <strong>of</strong> Memphis, but this partnership has not<br />

resulted in joint initiatives to improve the corridor between Memphis and the LMPC.<br />

87 One joint initiative that could improve the quality <strong>of</strong> the hinterland access in inland bulk shipping<br />

is by means <strong>of</strong> better web-based communication systems. Since shippers receive most benefits<br />

(better logistics planning), while operators have to make the investments, joint initiatives are<br />

problematic. <strong>The</strong> inland waterways operators associations do not play a leading role in this<br />

respect, nor do public organizations. It is unlikely that an initiative in this field would be<br />

successful unless large American shippers are willing to act as ‘leader firms’. Thus, setting up<br />

such a project is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> the actors in the LMPC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!