The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
148<br />
• <strong>The</strong> HAR in the LMPC is moderate across the board.<br />
<strong>The</strong> hinterland access regime in the LMPC<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> most important inland mode in the LMPC is inland waterways. Mainly dry bulk is<br />
transported over the vast Mississippi river network. Oil is processed to a large extent ‘on<br />
site’ or transported by pipeline. <strong>The</strong> inland shipping system for bulk is very efficient. <strong>The</strong><br />
widespread use <strong>of</strong> push-barges allows for economies <strong>of</strong> scale and better equipment<br />
utilization, while standardization secures efficient cargo handling. This system has already<br />
been ‘running’ for decades, so that improvements are incremental 87 . Table 59 shows the<br />
various initiatives/investments to improve the hinterland access regime in the LMPC.<br />
Table 59: Initiatives/investments to improve the hinterland access regime in the LMPC<br />
Mode <strong>of</strong><br />
coordination<br />
Relevant initiatives/investments<br />
Hierarchies No single firm has made major investments that have improved the hinterland<br />
accessibility.<br />
Interfirm alliances <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> strategic alliances to improve the hinterland accessibility is very limited.<br />
Associations <strong>The</strong> barge fleeting association, the freight forwarders association and the steamship<br />
association promote the interests <strong>of</strong> their members. <strong>The</strong>y are not actively lobbying for<br />
more infrastructure or a better interface with the terminals.<br />
Public-private<br />
partnerships<br />
Public<br />
organizations<br />
Public-private partnerships do not play a role in the HAR in the LMPC .<br />
<strong>The</strong> Public Belt Railroad is the most important public organization in the hinterland<br />
access regime. <strong>The</strong> port authorities are hardly involved. <strong>The</strong> port <strong>of</strong> New Orleans has a<br />
(strategic) partnership with the inland port <strong>of</strong> Memphis, but this partnership has not<br />
resulted in joint initiatives to improve the corridor between Memphis and the LMPC.<br />
87 One joint initiative that could improve the quality <strong>of</strong> the hinterland access in inland bulk shipping<br />
is by means <strong>of</strong> better web-based communication systems. Since shippers receive most benefits<br />
(better logistics planning), while operators have to make the investments, joint initiatives are<br />
problematic. <strong>The</strong> inland waterways operators associations do not play a leading role in this<br />
respect, nor do public organizations. It is unlikely that an initiative in this field would be<br />
successful unless large American shippers are willing to act as ‘leader firms’. Thus, setting up<br />
such a project is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> the actors in the LMPC.