01.03.2013 Views

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />

vis-à-vis experts working with large organizations. When relevant, an analysis <strong>of</strong> differences<br />

in responses <strong>of</strong> both groups is made.<br />

7.6 Selection <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

<strong>The</strong> empirical part consists <strong>of</strong> three cases. This enables comparison between the cases to<br />

find out to what extent results are related to the ‘local context’ and to what extent they can<br />

be generalized. Since the three case studies are in different environments, results that hold<br />

for these three cases can be regarded as ‘stylized facts’ that hold for other cases <strong>of</strong> port<br />

clusters as well. <strong>The</strong> case selection was based on criteria other than cluster performance, to<br />

avoid a focus on ‘cluster success stories’ that dominate in the empirical research (Markusen,<br />

1999).<br />

Three criteria have been used to select the cases. First, the port clusters should be located<br />

in different environments. Thus, port clusters had to be located in different port ranges (such<br />

as the Hamburg-Le Havre port range). Second, a case study should be feasible, given<br />

limitations imposed by language (English or Dutch). Third, the cases should be ‘substantial<br />

clusters’, in the sense that port activities are <strong>of</strong> substantial size, both in absolute terms and<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> their importance in a regional economy. Ports in very large cities, such as New<br />

York and Bombay are not selected, because the port cluster is a small component <strong>of</strong> the<br />

regional economy. As a consequence, the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> the cluster population is small<br />

compared to the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> the urban region, the cluster labor market is strongly<br />

dependent on the metropolitan labor market and cluster specific agglomeration economies<br />

and diseconomies are also subordinate to metropolitan agglomeration forces. Fourth, the<br />

ports should have a ‘transit function’. In such ports, competition with other ports is relevant.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> these criteria, the port clusters in Rotterdam, Durban and <strong>The</strong> Lower<br />

Mississippi were selected. <strong>The</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Singapore could also have been selected on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the criteria, but this port was not included, because difficulties were expected with the<br />

survey instrument, in terms <strong>of</strong> ‘finding the right experts’ and ‘getting realistic answers’<br />

because cultural differences might lead to different (less outspoken) answers and the<br />

questions require a ‘self critical attitude’ which was thought to be more questionable in the<br />

Singaporese context, where governmental organizations are very important.<br />

It can be argued that the three selected port clusters are the largest <strong>of</strong> their continents.<br />

Rotterdam and <strong>The</strong> Lower Mississippi are the largest in throughput volume. Both have a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!