The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
78<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />
vis-à-vis experts working with large organizations. When relevant, an analysis <strong>of</strong> differences<br />
in responses <strong>of</strong> both groups is made.<br />
7.6 Selection <strong>of</strong> cases<br />
<strong>The</strong> empirical part consists <strong>of</strong> three cases. This enables comparison between the cases to<br />
find out to what extent results are related to the ‘local context’ and to what extent they can<br />
be generalized. Since the three case studies are in different environments, results that hold<br />
for these three cases can be regarded as ‘stylized facts’ that hold for other cases <strong>of</strong> port<br />
clusters as well. <strong>The</strong> case selection was based on criteria other than cluster performance, to<br />
avoid a focus on ‘cluster success stories’ that dominate in the empirical research (Markusen,<br />
1999).<br />
Three criteria have been used to select the cases. First, the port clusters should be located<br />
in different environments. Thus, port clusters had to be located in different port ranges (such<br />
as the Hamburg-Le Havre port range). Second, a case study should be feasible, given<br />
limitations imposed by language (English or Dutch). Third, the cases should be ‘substantial<br />
clusters’, in the sense that port activities are <strong>of</strong> substantial size, both in absolute terms and<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> their importance in a regional economy. Ports in very large cities, such as New<br />
York and Bombay are not selected, because the port cluster is a small component <strong>of</strong> the<br />
regional economy. As a consequence, the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> the cluster population is small<br />
compared to the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> the urban region, the cluster labor market is strongly<br />
dependent on the metropolitan labor market and cluster specific agglomeration economies<br />
and diseconomies are also subordinate to metropolitan agglomeration forces. Fourth, the<br />
ports should have a ‘transit function’. In such ports, competition with other ports is relevant.<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> these criteria, the port clusters in Rotterdam, Durban and <strong>The</strong> Lower<br />
Mississippi were selected. <strong>The</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Singapore could also have been selected on the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> the criteria, but this port was not included, because difficulties were expected with the<br />
survey instrument, in terms <strong>of</strong> ‘finding the right experts’ and ‘getting realistic answers’<br />
because cultural differences might lead to different (less outspoken) answers and the<br />
questions require a ‘self critical attitude’ which was thought to be more questionable in the<br />
Singaporese context, where governmental organizations are very important.<br />
It can be argued that the three selected port clusters are the largest <strong>of</strong> their continents.<br />
Rotterdam and <strong>The</strong> Lower Mississippi are the largest in throughput volume. Both have a