01.03.2013 Views

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 11 – Governance and <strong>Performance</strong> in <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong>; Results <strong>of</strong> the Cases 157<br />

11.4.3 Marketing and promotion<br />

Table 63 shows the expert evaluation <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the marketing and promotion regime<br />

in the three cases:<br />

Table 63: Expert evaluation <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the marketing and promotion regime<br />

Variable Rotterdam Durban LMPC<br />

Leader firms 0.5 -0.5 -0.2<br />

Organizational infrastructure 1.3* -0.8 -0.2<br />

Public actors 1.4 -0.2** 1.3***<br />

Community argument 0.2**** 0.1 -0.2<br />

Voice 0.7 -0.5** 0.9***<br />

Overall score 0.7 -0.7 0.2<br />

Average scores on a scale from –5 (very bad) to +5 (very good)<br />

* Significantly higher score than in other two port clusters<br />

** Significantly lower score than in two other port clusters<br />

*** Significantly higher score than average <strong>of</strong> all factors in same port cluster<br />

**** Significantly lower average judgment <strong>of</strong> all factors in same port cluster<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> these results, the following conclusions can be drawn:<br />

• <strong>The</strong> marketing and promotion regime in Durban is the worst <strong>of</strong> the three cases,<br />

especially because public actors ‘underperform’ compared to the other cases and there<br />

is a lack <strong>of</strong> voice.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> public actors in Rotterdam and the LMPC is appreciated.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> organizational infrastructure in Rotterdam is in place, in contrast to both other ports.<br />

• In general, the community argument is not present in the marketing and promotion<br />

regime. Firms are not willing to invest in marketing for the port community as a whole.<br />

<strong>The</strong> marketing and promotion regime in the LMPC<br />

<strong>The</strong> five port authorities in the LMPC promote their jurisdiction. <strong>The</strong> port <strong>of</strong> New Orleans is<br />

the most active in marketing. Until recently, private firms from the LMPC were not involved in<br />

joint marketing efforts. As a consequence, the LMPC as a whole is not well marketed. With a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!