The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
84<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />
processes that take place in seaports. Slack was the first scholar to pay attention to location<br />
decisions <strong>of</strong> the port service industry. He shows that physical proximity to the terminals<br />
becomes less important for the port service industry (Slack 1988). Van Klink (1995) explains<br />
the decline <strong>of</strong> employment in ports by the relocation <strong>of</strong> logistics activities 59 . He terms this<br />
process ‘maritime deconcentration’.<br />
<strong>The</strong> cluster approach has hardly been used to analyze ports. Perhaps the best quantitative<br />
port cluster study is the annually repeated study <strong>of</strong> Antwerp’s port cluster, by the Bank <strong>of</strong><br />
Belgium. In this study, a cluster population <strong>of</strong> about 1000 firms, including logistics and<br />
industrial firms is identified. <strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the value added <strong>of</strong> this cluster is calculated.<br />
However, this study does not explain the performance <strong>of</strong> cluster.<br />
Haezendonck (2001) is the first scholar who uses the term ‘port cluster’ and draws from<br />
cluster theories. She defines a port cluster as ‘the set <strong>of</strong> interdependent firms engaged in<br />
port related activities, located within the same port region and possibly with similar strategies<br />
leading to competitive advantage and characterized by a joint competitive position vis-à-vis<br />
the environment external to the cluster’ (Haezendonck, 2001, p. 136).<br />
Haezendonck analyzes the performance <strong>of</strong> a port cluster with an adapted version <strong>of</strong> Porter’s<br />
diamond framework (Porter, 1990, Rugman et al, 1995). She identifies 14 factors that<br />
influence the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> seaports, including internal competition, internal<br />
cooperation, client relationships in the cluster, the presence <strong>of</strong> related and supporting<br />
industries and the behavior <strong>of</strong> (different levels <strong>of</strong>) the government. This study is a major<br />
contribution to understanding port clusters, but has the following shortcomings:<br />
• <strong>The</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> identifying firms in the cluster is not addressed. This is relevant since the<br />
question <strong>of</strong> what actually is a port cluster is still unclear.<br />
• A focus on two commodity groups: containers and breakbulk. An analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
competitiveness <strong>of</strong> a complete port cluster is still lacking.<br />
59 Van Klink’s work is a shift towards analyzing ports as clusters <strong>of</strong> economic activities, but he<br />
does not use the term cluster, or the literature on clusters. <strong>The</strong> same is true for Winkelmans<br />
(1984). His work can be regarded as a port cluster study ‘avant la lettre’.