01.03.2013 Views

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

84<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />

processes that take place in seaports. Slack was the first scholar to pay attention to location<br />

decisions <strong>of</strong> the port service industry. He shows that physical proximity to the terminals<br />

becomes less important for the port service industry (Slack 1988). Van Klink (1995) explains<br />

the decline <strong>of</strong> employment in ports by the relocation <strong>of</strong> logistics activities 59 . He terms this<br />

process ‘maritime deconcentration’.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cluster approach has hardly been used to analyze ports. Perhaps the best quantitative<br />

port cluster study is the annually repeated study <strong>of</strong> Antwerp’s port cluster, by the Bank <strong>of</strong><br />

Belgium. In this study, a cluster population <strong>of</strong> about 1000 firms, including logistics and<br />

industrial firms is identified. <strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the value added <strong>of</strong> this cluster is calculated.<br />

However, this study does not explain the performance <strong>of</strong> cluster.<br />

Haezendonck (2001) is the first scholar who uses the term ‘port cluster’ and draws from<br />

cluster theories. She defines a port cluster as ‘the set <strong>of</strong> interdependent firms engaged in<br />

port related activities, located within the same port region and possibly with similar strategies<br />

leading to competitive advantage and characterized by a joint competitive position vis-à-vis<br />

the environment external to the cluster’ (Haezendonck, 2001, p. 136).<br />

Haezendonck analyzes the performance <strong>of</strong> a port cluster with an adapted version <strong>of</strong> Porter’s<br />

diamond framework (Porter, 1990, Rugman et al, 1995). She identifies 14 factors that<br />

influence the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> seaports, including internal competition, internal<br />

cooperation, client relationships in the cluster, the presence <strong>of</strong> related and supporting<br />

industries and the behavior <strong>of</strong> (different levels <strong>of</strong>) the government. This study is a major<br />

contribution to understanding port clusters, but has the following shortcomings:<br />

• <strong>The</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> identifying firms in the cluster is not addressed. This is relevant since the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> what actually is a port cluster is still unclear.<br />

• A focus on two commodity groups: containers and breakbulk. An analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> a complete port cluster is still lacking.<br />

59 Van Klink’s work is a shift towards analyzing ports as clusters <strong>of</strong> economic activities, but he<br />

does not use the term cluster, or the literature on clusters. <strong>The</strong> same is true for Winkelmans<br />

(1984). His work can be regarded as a port cluster study ‘avant la lettre’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!