The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
198<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> institutional setting <strong>of</strong> port authorities closely resembles this ‘perfect setting’: port<br />
authorities are mostly not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it, generate revenues from fairly general port charges and<br />
make investments to improve the performance <strong>of</strong> the cluster. Special to the port authority is<br />
its revenue structure, which creates substantial resources to act as a cluster manager. This<br />
particular institutional setting contributes to the quality <strong>of</strong> the governance in seaport cluster.<br />
<strong>The</strong> port authority is special in this respect; in other clusters organizations with a similar<br />
institutional position are missing. We argue that the cluster manager model <strong>of</strong> port<br />
authorities is a relatively advanced arrangement to govern clusters.<br />
13.11 Relations between the different variables<br />
<strong>The</strong> different variables <strong>of</strong> cluster performance are related. For instance, a better training and<br />
education regime (governance) strengthens the agglomeration economy <strong>of</strong> a shared labor<br />
pool (structure). <strong>The</strong>se interrelations are assumed to be positive or neutral: when the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the variables increases, this has either no effect or a positive effect on the other<br />
variables. In general, these positive effects run from the governance variables to the<br />
structure variables, since some governance efforts aim to improve the structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cluster. Improvements <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> the cluster do not ‘automatically’ lead to better<br />
cluster governance. <strong>The</strong> following positive interrelations were found in the case studies:<br />
• <strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> intermediaries leads to more knowledge spillovers. Intermediaries also<br />
lower the entry barriers <strong>of</strong> a cluster, since intermediaries make knowledge and networks<br />
more open.<br />
• More trust leads to more knowledge spillovers, since firms are more inclined to share<br />
knowledge.<br />
• More leader firm behavior leads to more agglomeration forces, since leader firms<br />
improve the quality <strong>of</strong> the labor pool and improve knowledge spillovers in the cluster.<br />
More leader firm behavior can also lead to more internal competition. In various cases,<br />
including Huntsman in Rotterdam and Rennies in Durban, leader firms induce<br />
competition.<br />
• Better collective action regimes lead to stronger agglomeration effects, lower cluster<br />
barriers (for example the hinterland access regime in Rotterdam), and more<br />
heterogeneity (especially though marketing and promotion efforts).